Development of Machine Learning for Lost Production Opportunity Prediction and Production Optimization Through Workover Scheduling in Pertamina Hulu Sanga Sanga Field, Sanga-Sanga Block of East Kalimantan, Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i3.2150

Keywords:

lost production opportunity (LPO), unplanned downtime (UPDT), machine learning, workover, production planning

Abstract

Lost Production Opportunity (LPO) measures production that cannot be realized because a well or facility is constrained. In many field-planning workflows, LPO and workover schedules are still estimated from historical averages and a fixed production uplift for each job. Although practical, these assumptions do not represent the nonlinear interaction among production behavior, equipment failures, downtime, and intervention timing. This work examines whether those interactions can be learned from field data and used to improve the monthly scheduling of rigless workover jobs.Historical production, Planned Downtime (PDT), Unplanned Downtime (UPDT), and operational event records from Field ‘X’ were compiled at monthly resolution. XGBoost regression models were trained using a chronological data split and evaluated with MAE, RMSE, sMAPE, and actual-versus-predicted plots. The resulting LPO forecasts and feature-importance rankings were then incorporated into a Decision Support System (DSS). Together with workover capacity, expected uplift, job cost, commodity price, and operational constraints, the DSS assigns a monthly risk level and recommends whether workover activity should be increased, selected cautiously, or reduced.The gas and oil models produced sMAPE values of 16.79% and 19.06%, respectively. In the 2026 simulation, DSS-based scheduling increased gas production from 83.43 to 84.56 MMscfd and oil production from 9,650 to 9,805 BOPD relative to the conventional schedule. These results suggest that field data can be used not only to estimate LPO, but also to place rigless workover jobs in months where their production benefit is less exposed to operational disruption.

References

Allan, D., Bailey, W. J., Sauvé, B., Torrens, R., & Dhabi, A. (2016). The Defining Series: Integrated Asset Modeling. Source: www.slb.com/defining

Asihono, P. M. S., & Mulyono, N. B. (2023). Maintaining the Reliability of Production Facilities in Operation Management of Upstream Oil and Gas Industries: Case Study at GNK Gas Compression Station PT. PEP ZONA 4. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(2), 154–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.2.1858

Cio Mario, C., Saputra, R., Saefuddin, S., Triyono, T., Energi Indonesia, S., Metra, S., Gaskari, R., Martinez, H., Songchitruksa, P., Agustinus Kartika Djaya, B., Ranjan Sinha, R., & Vadivel, K. (2019). SPE-196326-MS Well Opportunity Register, Define and Selection: Changing the Game in Production Optimisation Using Automation and Analytics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/196326-MS

Dethlefs, J. C., & Chastain, B. (2012). Assessing Well-Integrity Risk: A Qualitative Model. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/142854-PA

Fauzan Amir, M., Nugroho PHW, J., Krisna Permadi, W., Ihsan, A., Nitasari, P. D., & Migas, S. (2022). “Kebijakan, Strategi dan Teknologi Tepat Guna untuk Meningkatkan Pengurasan Lapangan Minyak dan Gas di Indonesia” Data Analytics Applications in Oil and Gas Industry in Indonesia: Some Implementation in SKK Migas and Pertamina Hulu Rokan (PHR). Source link: https://journal.iatmi.or.id/index.php/ojs/article/download/248/254

Hadi, S., Osman, A., Iskandar Bahrun, A., Thura Khalid, M., Ismaon, M., Rahim, P. A., & Carigali Sdn Bhd, P. (2008). SPE 117954 Prudent and Integrated Production Planning to Maintain Excellent Operations in Angsi Field, Peninsular Malaysia Operations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/117954-MS

Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 679–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001

Hyoung, J., Lee, Y., & Han, S. (2024). Development of Machine Learning-Based Production Forecasting for Offshore Gas Fields Using a Dynamic Material Balance Equation. Energies, 17(21). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215268

Mat, M., Zainudin, M., Riyanto, L., Manaf, N H, & Petroleum, B. S. (2025). Unlocking Insights: Data Analytics to Predict Unplanned Production Deferment in Offshore Oil and Gas Wells. Source link: https://cdn.asp.events/CLIENT_SPE__29FE44FF_5056_B733_49EC4D60A02A6A7D/sites/iptc-2025/media/abstract_only/IPTC-24678.pdf

Maulana, F., Yasutra, A., & Syihab, Z. (2025). Case Study of Heterogeneity Index’s Effect on The Successful Workover Based on The Apriori Algorithm. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 48(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i1.1658

Montaño Moreno, J. J., Palmer Pol, A., Sesé Abad, A., & Cajal Blasco, B. (2013). Using the R-MAPE index as a resistant measure of forecast accuracy. Psicothema, 25(4), 500–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.23

Natural Gas Market Module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation 2025. (2025). Source: www.eia.gov

Nwaochei, F., Adelowotan, A., Liu, T., & Goldman, J. (2019). SPE-198821-MS Prioritizing Non-Rig Well Work Candidates Using Data Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/198821-MS

Okon, I. (2021). SPE-208246-MS Identification of Potential Candidate’s Wells for Workover Background of the study. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/208246-MS

Popa, A., Bloomquist, C., & Marghitoiu, S. (2023). The Investigation of Workover Rig Scheduling Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms - Part I. SPE Western Regional Meeting Proceedings, 2023-May. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/212948-MS

Siahaan, E., Mamat, I., Laksana, S. S., Setyowibowo, A., Naufal, A. A., Wulandari, O. E., Metra, S., Nainggolan, A. K., Arinandy, O. I., Ellen, L., Pramita, M. D., Tjiong, A., Wilian, Y., & Songchitruksa, P. (2022). Well Portfolio Optimisation: Accelerating Generation of Well Intervention Candidates with Automated Analytics and Machine Learning - A Case Study from Attaka Field, Indonesia. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition 2022, APOG 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/210614-MS

Smithson, T. (2016). The Defining Series: Reservoir Drive Mechanisms. Source: www.slb.com/defining

Teh, Y. H., Theseira, K., Abdul Karim, A. H., Hashim, N. S., Yakob, A. R., Musa, A. S., Borhan, N. A., Muhamad, S., & Sykahar, M. W. (2008). Preparing a Gas Field Development Plan : Tangga Barat Cluster Gas Project. International Petroleum Technology Conference. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-12488-MS

Von Flatern, R. (2014). Defining Intervention: Upstream Maintenance and Repair. Oilfield Review, 26(4), 62–63. Source: www.slb.com/defining

Wijaya, A. A., Aulianagara, R., Guo, W., Naibaho, F. M., Amirudin, U., & Asriwan, F. X. (2020). Multi-detector pulsed neutron tool application in low porosity reservoir - a case study in mutiara field, Indonesia. SPWLA 61st Annual Logging Symposium. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA-5082

Wisnu Ady Kusmono, B., & Ros Bangun, Y. (2024). Reducing Loss Production Opportunity (LPO) at PT Pertamina EP Donggi Matindok field. Interdisciplinary Social Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v3i4.730

Woodward, W. A., Gray, H. L., & Elliott, A. C. (2017). APPLIED TIME SERIES ANALYSIS WITH R Second Edition (SECOND EDITION). ISBN: 9781498734226

Downloads

Published

25-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles