Gas Saturated Sandstone Reservoirs Characterization through Probabilistic Seismic Inversion Using Bayesian Neural Networks

Authors

  • Edi Sanjaya Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Praditiyo Riyadi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0759-7183
  • Fadhlur Rahman Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i3.2138

Keywords:

probabilistic inversion, Bayesian Neural Network, petrophysical properties, gas sandstone

Abstract

Shallow gas-saturated sandstone reservoirs are prevalent throughout Indonesia, presenting highly lucrative economic prospects that are often hindered by complex geological heterogeneities. Characterization of these reservoirs typically relies on deterministic seismic inversion methods. However, the inherent non-uniqueness of such approaches yields singular solutions devoid of uncertainty quantification. This study proposes a robust probabilistic seismic inversion methodology utilizing a Convolutional Bayesian Neural Network (BNN). By incorporating Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, which forces the stochastic deactivation of hidden nodes during training, the algorithm successfully generates a comprehensive ensemble of predictive realizations. The proposed framework is evaluated using 2D pre-stack synthetic angle gathers (0 to 45°) across two scenarios: a baseline layer-cake model and a structurally complex faulted model incorporating random noise to simulate field-acquired data. Using seismic amplitudes and low-frequency models to simultaneously predict porosity, clay volume, and water saturation, the BNN demonstrates exceptional predictive accuracy on the baseline model, yielding an average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.03 and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9. When applied to the complex faulted model, the predictive fidelity naturally degraded (average R2 of 0.7 to 0.8; RMSE of 0.09 to 0.15), consistent with the inherent challenges of noise-contaminated data. Furthermore, a comparative analysis against a conventional model-based deterministic inversion reveals that while the deterministic approach better delineates fault architectures via horizon constraints, the BNN framework yields superior quantitative fidelity. Notably, the BNN successfully overcomes the systematic underestimation of porosity inherent in the deterministic acoustic impedance-to-porosity conversion process. The stochastic inversion explicitly produces 2D petrophysical cross-sections detailing the P10, P90, and mean distributions extracted from 50 realizations. Given their high fidelity, the mean distributions are directly applicable for reservoir characterization. Crucially, the probabilistic P10 and P90 boundary percentiles facilitate a comprehensive assessment of in-place hydrocarbon volumes. This study are currently limited to synthetic validation, and subsequent validation with real-field data is necessary before the approach can be practically applied.

References

Andrieu, J., Kutzky, B., Schackmann, B. T., Ag, G., Mahardhini, ; A, Abidiy, I., & Poitrenaud, H. M. (2018). Tunu: From Lab to Field Application with a New Hybrid Inorganic-Organic Sand Consolidation Fluid as Primary Treatment on Shallow Reservoirs. 2, 189548. http://onepetro.org/SPEFD/proceedings-pdf/18FD/2-18FD/D021S012R002/1213502/spe-189548-ms.pdf

Chala, A. T., & Ray, R. (2025). Uncertainty Quantification in Shear Wave Velocity Predictions: Integrating Explainable Machine Learning and Bayesian Inference. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031409

Coimbra, A., & Sampaio, M. A. (2025). Reservoir characterization based on data incorporation throughout production development. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 252, 213911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213911

Fariz, M., Zera, T., & Purba, H. (2022). Analisis Penyebaran Reservoir Batupasir Dan Karbonat Menggunakan Metode Inversi Seismik Studi Kasus : Lapangan RB, Blok Rangkas. Lembaran Publikasi Minyak Dan Gas Bumi, 56(2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.29017/LPMGB.56.2.959

Fernandes, F. J. D., Teixeira, L., Freire, A. F. M., & Lupinacci, W. M. (2024). Stochastic seismic inversion and Bayesian facies classification applied to porosity modeling and igneous rock identification. Petroleum Science, 21(2), 918–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.11.020

Gou, R., Zhang, Y., Zhu, X., & Gao, J. (2022). Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Subsurface Tomography based on the Eikonal Equation. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3286438

Grana, D., Azevedo, L., De Figueiredo, L., Connolly, P., & Mukerji, T. (2022). Probabilistic inversion of seismic data for reservoir petrophysical characterization: Review and examples. Geophysics, 87(5). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0776.1

Han, D., Nur, A., & Morgan, D. (1986). Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones. Geophysics, 51(11), 2093–2107. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442062

Horozal, S., Chae, S., Kim, D. H., Seo, J. M., Lee, S. M., Han, H. S., Cukur, D., & Kong, G. S. (2021). Seismic evidence of shallow gas in sediments on the southeastern continental shelf of Korea, East Sea (Japan Sea). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105291

Jin, H., Liu, C., & Guo, Z. Q. (2024). Gas prediction in tight sandstones based on the rock-physics-derived seismic amplitude variation versus offset method. Petroleum Science, 21(6), 3951–3964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.06.006

Kuai, Z. Y., Cao, D. P., & Jin, C. (2025). Joint inversion with prestack waveform and spectral information for layered media. Petroleum Science, 22(10), 4065–4082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.06.004

Laidlaw, D., Madyanova, M., Agee, D., & Hustache, H. (2012). Combination of Dual String Single Trip Multi-Zone Completion Systems and High Rate Formation Pack as a Proven Completion Methodology for an Unconsolidated Reservoir: Case Study Tunu Field. https://doi.org/10.2118/155202-MS

Li, P., Grana, D., & Liu, M. (2024). Bayesian neural network and Bayesian physics-informed neural network via variational inference for seismic petrophysical inversion. Geophysics, 89(6), M185–M196. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0737.1

Li, P., Liu, M., Alfarraj, M., Tahmasebi, P., & Grana, D. (2024). Probabilistic physics-informed neural network for seismic petrophysical inversion. Geophysics, 89(2), M17–M32. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0214.1

Liu, J., Gui, Z., Gao, G., Li, Y., Wei, Q., & Liu, Y. (2023). Predicting Shear Wave Velocity Using a Convolutional Neural Network and Dual-Constraint Calculation for Anisotropic Parameters Incorporating Compressional and Shear Wave Velocities. Processes, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11082356

Lowrie, W., & Fichtner, A. (2020). Fundamentals of Geophysics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108685917

Mahmud, H. Ben, Bin Muhammad Hisham, M. H., Mahmud, W. M., Leong, V. H., & Shafiq, M. U. (2020). Petrophysical interpretations of subsurface stratigraphic correlations, Baram Delta, Sarawak, Malaysia. Energy Geoscience, 1(3–4), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2020.04.005

Putra, H. A., Sanjaya, E., Suwondo, Nafian, M., Riyadi, P., & Atmoko, W. (2026). Seismic-Based Reservoir Characterization of The Lower Arang Formation in West Natuna Basin Using Acoustic Impedance Inversion and Seismic Attributes. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 49(2), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i2.2065

Romero, J., Heidrich, W., & Ravasi, M. (2025). Bayesian seismic inversion with implicit neural representations. Geophysical Journal International, 242(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf249

Shan, H., Sun, Y., Li, B., Wang, H., & Zhang, G. (2026). Enhancing marine shallow gas production through hybrid vertical and horizontal wells. Applied Ocean Research, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2026.105027

Siahgoli, H. M., Riahi, M. A., Nabi-Bidhendi, M., & Seyedali, S. (2025). Integrating Bayesian classification and ANN for lithofacies classification using well and seismic data: Bahregansar case study. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06701-2

Simutė, S., Boehm, C., Krischer, L., Gokhberg, A., Vallée, M., & Fichtner, A. (2023). Bayesian Seismic Source Inversion With a 3-D Earth Model of the Japanese Islands. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 128(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024231

Sukma, R. F. N., Rosid, M. S., & Wijanarko, E. (2025). Telisa Formation Characterization Using Seismic Acoustic Impedance Inversion In The Akasia Area of The Central Sumatra Basin. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 48(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i2.1774

Sun, Y. (孙有壮), Pang, S. (庞善臣), Zhang, J. (张军华), & Zhang, Y. (张永安). (2024). Porosity prediction through well logging data: A combined approach of convolutional neural network and transformer model (CNN-transformer). Physics of Fluids, 36(2), 026604. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0190078

Taqiy, Z. F., Utomo, W., Shidqii, M., & Susilo, A. (2026). Karakterisasi Reservoir Berdasarkan Analisis Inversi Seismik Impedansi Akustik dan Multiatribut Seismik, Studi Kasus: Lapangan Bunyu Tapa, Cekungan Tarakan, Kalimantan Utara. Lembaran Publikasi Minyak Dan Gas Bumi, 59(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.29017/lpmgb.59.3.1891

Widarsono, B., Musu, J. T., & Yohanes, Y. D. W. (2025). Rock Compressibility Characteristics of Oil and Gas Sandstone Reservoirs in the Western Part of Indonesia. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 48(4), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i4.1936

Xiang, Y., Song, Z., Wang, Z., & Song, G. (2026). Residual Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Seismic Tomography with Multi-Source Prior Constraints. Mathematics, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/math14081392

Yu, W. (2024). Common Misconceptions on Rules of Mixtures for Predicting Elastic Properties of Composites. AIAA Journal, 62(5), 1982–1987. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J063863

Yusof, M. A., Agi, A., Gbadamosi, A., Junin, R., & Abbas, A. (2018). Uncertainty analysis of hydrocarbon in place calculation using 3D seismic and well data during appraisal stage – Case study of Goldie Field, offshore Sarawak. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 57, 238–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.06.038

Yuwono, R. W., Fitriana, B. S., Kirana, P. S., Djaelani, S., & Sjafwan, B. A. (2012). Biogenic Gas Exploration and Development in Bentu PSC, Central Sumatra Basin, Indonesia*.

Zhang, X., & Curtis, A. (2021). Bayesian Geophysical Inversion Using Invertible Neural Networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022320

Downloads

Published

30-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles