Emission Trading Systems in Indonesia’s Power Generation Sub-Sector:Comparative Analysis, Governance Failures, and Policy Recommendations

Authors

  • Paul Patar Maruli Butarbutar Universitas Trisakti
  • Muhammad Zilal Hamzah Universitas YARSI
  • Eleonora Sofilda Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i2.2106

Keywords:

emission trading system, carbon pricing, government force majeure, power purchase agreement, polluter-pays principle, PTBAE-PU, enforcement failure, fiscal sustainability, energy transition, Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesia’s Emission Trading System (ETS) for the power generation sub-sector is a central instrument for achieving its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) targets, yet critical governance failures undermine its environmental and fiscal effectiveness. A significant gap in the existing literature concerns how long-term contractual provisions in power markets interact with ETS compliance obligations, and whether those interactions systematically undermine the polluter-pays principle. This study employs a qualitative multi-method design combining comparative institutional analysis of ETS frameworks in the European Union, China, and Indonesia with primary data from an expert Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of six informants, coded using NVivo 12 qualitative software. The study identifies two structural governance failures. First, the ETS is operationally voluntary: the penalty regulation mandated by Law No. 7/2021 has not been issued by the Ministry of Finance, eliminating the compliance incentive. Second, a Government Force Majeure (GFM) clause embedded in Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) between the state utility PT PLN and Independent Power Producers (IPPs) creates a multi-stage fiscal pathway through which ETS compliance costs may be transferred from coal-fired power plant operators to the state energy subsidy budget — structurally inverting the polluter-pays principle. Comparative analysis further reveals that while Indonesia’s intensity-based ETS shares design features with China’s national carbon market, it lacks the enforcement architecture that China has progressively established. The study contributes a novel governance failure mode — the GFM–ETS fiscal compensation pathway — not previously theorised in ETS governance literature, and recommends enforcement regulation issuance, GFM–subsidy fiscal interface reform, integrated MRV platform development, bottom-up cap-setting anchored in plant-level data, and establishment of a dedicated carbon market authority.

References

Aladar, A., Rahmawati, S. D., & Lumban Gaol, A. H. (2026). A techno-economic study on the impact of carbon tax on production rate and production duration in an oil field. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i2.2049

Bandur, A. (2019). Penelitian kualitatif: Disertasi, tesis, skripsi dan makalah. Mitra Wacana Media.

Bassi, A. M., Pallaske, G., Bridle, R., & Bajaj, K. (2023). Emission reduction via fossil fuel subsidy removal and carbon pricing: Creating synergies with revenue recycling. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/fossil-fuel-subsidy-carbon-pricing-synergies

Caldecott, B., Dericks, G., & Mitchell, J. (2017). Stranded assets and subcritical coal: The risk to companies and investors. University of Oxford Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/research/sustainable-finance/publications/stranded-assets-and-subcritical-coal.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deng, H., Li, J., Pang, T., & Duan, M. (2018). MRV and compliance issues in China’s carbon market pilots. Climate Policy, 18(7), 867–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1454986

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

ESDM (Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral). (2022). Peraturan Menteri ESDM No. 16/2022 tentang Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Nilai Ekonomi Karbon Subsektor Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik. Republic of Indonesia. https://jdih.esdm.go.id/peraturan/PerMen%20ESDM%20Nomor%2016%20Tahun%202022.pdf

ESDM. (2024). Perdagangan emisi subsektor pembangkit tenaga listrik tahun 2024. Directorate General of Electricity. https://gatrik.esdm.go.id

ESDM. (2025). Keputusan Menteri ESDM No. 85/2025 tentang Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasional (RUKN). Republic of Indonesia. https://jdih.esdm.go.id

European Commission. (2024). EU emissions trading system (EU ETS). https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets_en

Fischer, C., & Springborn, M. (2011). Emissions targets and the real business cycle: Intensity targets versus caps or taxes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(3), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.04.005

Goulder, L. H., Long, X., Lu, J., & Morgenstern, R. D. (2019). China’s unconventional nationwide CO₂ emissions trading system: The wide-ranging impacts of an implicit output subsidy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98, 102243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102243

Grubb, M., & Neuhoff, K. (2006). Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: Policy overview. Climate Policy, 6(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685584

Hahn, R. W., & Stavins, R. N. (2010). The effect of allowance allocations on cap-and-trade system performance. Journal of Law and Economics, 54(S4), S267–S294. https://doi.org/10.1086/647809

Hogan, L., & Goldsworthy, B. (2010). International mineral taxation: Experience and issues. In P. Daniel, M. Keen, & C. McPherson (Eds.), The taxation of petroleum and minerals: Principles, problems and practice (pp. 122–162). Routledge/IMF. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843567

Heggelund, G., Stensdal, I., & Duan, M. (2022). China’s carbon market: Potential for success? Politics and Governance, 10(1), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4851

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964

Huang, H., Zheng, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Carbon pricing and biomass co-firing: Emission abatement costs and fuel substitution in coal-intensive power systems. Applied Energy, 310, 118523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118523

ICAP (International Carbon Action Partnership). (2016). Emissions trading in practice: A handbook on design and implementation. World Bank Group. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-practice-handbook-design-and-implementation

ICAP. (2024). Emissions trading worldwide: Status report 2024. ICAP. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-worldwide-2024-icap-status-report

IEA (International Energy Agency). (2024). World Energy Outlook 2024. IEA Publications. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024

IMF. (2024). Reform of the emissions trading system (ETS) in China (IMF Selected Issues Paper No. 2024/012). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400267970.018

IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

Kettner, C., Köppl, A., Schleicher, S. P., & Thenius, G. (2008). Stringency and distribution in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: First evidence. Climate Policy, 8(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0412

KLHK (Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan). (2022). Enhanced Nationally Determined Contribution Indonesia. Republic of Indonesia. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-09/ENDC%20Indonesia%20(English).pdf

Li, J., & Sun, C. (2018). Towards a low-carbon economy by removing fossil fuel subsidies? Energy Economics, 74, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.007

Li, K., Qi, S., Yan, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). China’s ETS pilots: Program design, industry risk, and long-term investment. Energy Policy, 162, 112799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112799

Liu, L., Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). Barriers to effective carbon trading in China’s pilot programs. Energy & Environment, 26(1–2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.1-2.177

Lund, D. (2009). Rent taxation for nonrenewable resources. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1(1), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144216

MEMR (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources). (2022). Statistik ketenagalistrikan 2021. Directorate General of Electricity, Republic of Indonesia. https://gatrik.esdm.go.id

MEMR. (2025). Handbook of energy and economic statistics of Indonesia 2024. Directorate General of New, Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation, Republic of Indonesia. https://www.esdm.go.id/en/publication/handbook-of-energy-economic-statistics-of-indonesia

Ministry of Finance (Kementerian Keuangan). (2019). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 174/PMK.02/2019 tentang Tata Cara Penyediaan, Penghitungan, Pembayaran, dan Pertanggungjawaban Subsidi Listrik. Republic of Indonesia. https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id

Ministry of Finance. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 178/PMK.02/2021 tentang Perubahan Atas PMK No. 174/PMK.02/2019. Republic of Indonesia. https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fullText/2021/178~PMK.02~2021Per.pdf

Ministry of Finance. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 20/PMK.02/2025 tentang Perubahan Atas PMK No. 178/PMK.02/2021. Republic of Indonesia. https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id

Munnings, C., Morgenstern, R., Wang, Z., & Liu, X. (2014). Assessing the design of three carbon trading pilot programmes in China (RFF Discussion Paper DP 14-36). Resources for the Future. https://www.rff.org/publications/working-papers/assessing-the-design-of-three-carbon-trading-pilot-programs-in-china/

Myles, G. D. (1995). Externalities. In G. D. Myles, Public economics (pp. 312–347). Cambridge University Press.

Pang, T., & Duan, M. (2016). Cap setting and allowance allocation in China’s emissions trading pilot programmes. Climate Policy, 16(7), 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1052956

Pfeiffer, A., Millar, R., Hepburn, C., & Beinhocker, E. (2016). The ‘2°C capital stock’ for electricity generation: Committed cumulative carbon emissions from the electricity generation sector and the transition to a green economy. Applied Energy, 179, 1395–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.004

Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan.

PLN (PT PLN Persero). (2022). Laporan statistik 2021. PLN. https://www.pln.co.id

PLN. (2023). Laporan statistik 2022. PLN. https://www.pln.co.id

PLN. (2024). Laporan statistik 2023. PLN. https://www.pln.co.id

Republic of Indonesia. (2021a). Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id

Republic of Indonesia. (2021b). Peraturan Presiden No. 98/2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Nilai Ekonomi Karbon. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/178764/perpres-no-98-tahun-2021

Republic of Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Presiden No. 110/2025 tentang Penyelenggaraan Nilai Ekonomi Karbon. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id

Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006). CO₂ cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685587

Sorrell, S. (2020). Jevons’ paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 149, 111905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111905

Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434

Trantidis, A. (2023). Government externalities. Public Choice, 197, 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01068-7

Tordo, S. (2007). Fiscal systems for hydrocarbons: Design issues. World Bank Working Paper No. 123. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7075-8

Wang, P., Liu, Z., Tan, X., & Liu, L. (2019). Key challenges for China’s carbon emissions trading program. WIREs Climate Change, 10(5), e599. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.599

World Bank. (2019). The power of the data: Improving power sector performance in sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31291

World Bank. (2024). State and trends of carbon pricing dashboard. World Bank Group. https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org

Yu, H., & Lo, K. (2014). Emissions trading in China: Overview and lessons learned. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(6), 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1200

Zhang, Y. J., Wang, A. D., & Tan, W. (2014). The impact of China’s carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises. Energy Policy, 75, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.049

Downloads

Published

29-06-2026

Issue

Section

Articles