Investigation of Insulation Effect on Wax Deposition Using a Flow Assurance Simulator

Authors

  • Astra Agus Pramana Universitas Pertamina
  • Inggrialianthari Rezkhi Trinugrahandini Universitas Pertamina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i2.2104

Keywords:

insulation , wax deposition, OLGA, rubber, concrete

Abstract

Wax deposition remains one of the most common and disruptive problems in oil and gas pipelines. To address this issue, various methods are developed for both onshore and offshore fields according to their field characteristics. Insulation is one of the mitigation methods that generally performs well, despite several implementation challenges. This study presents a wax-deposition model to assess the effectiveness of insulation as a mitigation method. The analyzed fluid flows from the MOON platform to the SELENA platform in Field W through a carbon-steel subsea pipeline. The pipeline is modeled over a simulated distance of approximately 0–1,900 m, with detailed wax-deposition analysis focused on the critical section of 0–700 m. Rubber and concrete are applied to evaluate their performance as pipeline insulation materials. This study uses five scenarios with two different materials. The results show that, in all cases, wax thickness reduction reaches 100%, while rubber insulation performs more effectively than concrete in reducing temperature decline and heat loss. In addition, other parameters, such as pressure, Wax Appearance Temperature (WAT), and flow rate, are analyzed in this study.

References

American Petroleum Institute (API). (2014). API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 583 FIRST EDITION - Corrosion Under Insulation and Fireproofing. IHS Energy.

Bauck, I.-J. T. (2013). Flow Assurance: A System Perspective. MEK4450-FMC Subsea Technologies.

Bendiksen, K. H., Maines, D., Moe, R., & Nuland, S. (1991). The Dynamic Two-Fluid Model OLGA: Theory and Application. SPE Production Engineering, 6(02), 171–180. doi:10.2118/19451-pa

Huang, Z., Zheng, S., & Fogler, H. (2015). Wax Deposition: Experimental Characterizations, Theoretical Modelling, and Field Practices. USA: Taylor and Francis Group.

Lasifa, W.-A., (2021). Pencocokan Kurva Penderita Covid-19 Di Sumatera Barat Dengan Model Hampir Eksponensial. Universitas Andalas.

Mansoori, G Ali. (2009). PHASE BEHAVIOR IN PETROLEUM FLUIDS. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237733355_PHASE_BEHAVIOR_IN_PETROLEUM_FLUIDS/citation/download

Pramana, A.A., et al. (2025). Introducing Cork as an Alternative Insulator to Polyurethane in Field X Production Pipelines: A Simulation Study Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 48(3), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i3.1871

Pramana, A.A., & Pagpa, T.A. (2023). Analisis Keefektifan Pour Point Depressant pada Waxy Crude Oil pada Lapangan TAP. Lembaran Publikasi Minyak dan Gas Bumi (LPMGB), 57(1). https://doi.org/10.29017/LPMGB.57.1.1312

Schlumberger, (2017). 'OLGA User Manual'.

Septiano, J., Yasutra, A., & Rahmawati, S.D. (2022). Building a Machine Learning Proxy Model for the Prediction of Wax Deposition Rate in Two-Phase Flow Water-Oil Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 45(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.45.1.922

Singh, A., Benavides, M. S., Saint Marcoux, J.-F., & Barrufet, M. A. (2004). Dilution Strategies for Wax Management and Control for Deepwater Development from a Flow Assurance Perspective: Part I - Current Practice and Perspective. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. doi:10.2118/90688-ms

Sousa, A. L. (2019). Preventing and removing wax deposition inside vertical wells. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

Tobing, E. M. L., & Eni, H. (2013). Peningkatan Perolehan Reservoir Minyak 'R' dengan Injeksi Alkali-Surfaktan-Polimer pada Skala Laboratorium. Lembaran Publikasi Minyak dan Gas Bumi, Vol. 4 7 No. 2, Agustus 2013, hlm. 87–96.

Tony, B., Chandra, S., Purba, R. J., Solihan, M. F., & Saputra, E. D. (2025). Transient Simulation to Analyze Wax Deposition and Flow Pattern Behavior Along Tubing Under Esp Installation and Gassy Well Condition. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 48(3), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i3.1731

Theyab MA. Wax deposition process: mechanisms, affecting factors, and mitigation methods. Open Access J Sci. 2018;2(2):112–118. DOI: 10.15406/oajs.2018.02.00054

Theyab, M. (2021). 'A review of wax mitigation methods through hydrocarbon production', Journal of Petroleum Research, 11, 412.

Yang, J., Lu, Y., Daraboina, N., & Sarica, C. (2020). 'Wax deposition mechanisms: Is the current description sufficient?', Fuel, 275.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles