Mitigating Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Produced Water: Performance of MB-X Biocide Assessed by SRB‑BART at a Mature Onshore Asset
PERFORMANCE OF MB-X BIOCIDE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i3.2068Keywords:
Sulfate-reducing bacteria, MIC, produced water, biocide MB‑X, SRB‑BART, mature onshore assetAbstract
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are major drivers of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) and reservoir souring in waterflooding operations, particularly in mature onshore assets with high produced-water volumes. This is showing the need for effective control of SRB to mitigate potential risks and maintain the integrity of waterflooding operations. Therefore, this study is aiming to evaluate the efficacy of the biocide MB-X at multiple doses (50-200 ppm) in suppressing SRB activity and population using the SRB-BART (Biological Activity Reaction Test). The experiment is being conducted by collecting produced-water samples from the Outlet WT at Field MX, followed by daily monitoring of SRB activity to determine the reaction day. The data obtained are being converted into population estimates (CFU/mL) according to the commercial kit guidance: Day-3 = 1.15 × 10⁵ CFU/mL; Day-4 = 2.7 × 10⁴ CFU/mL; Day-10 = 5 CFU/mL; Day-11 < 1 CFU/mL. Aggressiveness is being classified according to the kit scoring, namely Aggressive, Not Aggressive, and Negative. The results are showing that the control (blank) is showing a BB-type SRB consortium (anaerobe-dominant), with 1.15 × 10⁵ CFU/mL being classified as Aggressive. MB-X 50 ppm is reducing the population to 2.7 × 10⁴ CFU/mL, but the response is remaining Aggressive. In comparison, MB-X 100 ppm is suppressing counts to 5 CFU/mL (Not Aggressive), while MB-X 200 ppm is yielding a Negative response, showing undetected SRB activity. These results are indicating that MB-X at ≥100 ppm is effectively controlling SRB under test conditions, with 200 ppm achieving apparent eradication as detected by SRB-BART. However, interpretation of the statistical outcomes is being constrained by the limited number of treatment replicates, suggesting that the results should be considered a preliminary site-specific evaluation of MB-X performance. Consequently, future studies are being recommended to conduct field verification through replication, matrix controls, and in-situ corrosion monitoring to confirm performance durability.
References
ASTM D4412 19. (2019). Standard Test Methods for SRB in Water and Water Formed Deposits (MPN). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4412-19
Bødtker, G., Thorstenson, T., Lillebø, B. L. P., Thorbjørnsen, B. E., Ulvøen, R. H., Sunde, E., & Torsvik, T. (2008). The effect of long-term nitrate treatment on SRB activity, corrosion rate and bacterial community composition in offshore water injection systems. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 35(12), 1625–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0406-x
Gerrit Voordouw, Johanna Voordouw, & Tijan Pinnock. (2017). Effect of Biocides and Corrosion Inhibitors on SRB-Mediated MIC Under Flow Conditions. ONE PETRO - NACE CORROSION, NACE-2017-9650. https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings-abstract/CORR17/CORR17/NACE-2017-9650/125669
Hach Company. (2016). Bacteria, Sulfate-reducing Visual determination Semi-quantitative SRB-BART TM 1.
J. Fajt. (2023). Sometime More is Just More: THPS Biocide Laboratory Kill Study on Wildtype Sulfate Reducing Bacteria Available to Purchase. AMPP Annual Conference + Expo, Denver, Colorado, USA, 18858. https://onepetro.org/amppcorr/proceedings-abstract/AMPP23/AMPP23/AMPP-2023-18858/526776
Javier Vilcaez, Sanzo Miyazawa, Koicho Suto, & Chihiro Inoue. (2006). Numerical Evaluation of Biocide Treatment against SRB. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 50, 208–217.
Lv, X., Wang, C., Liu, J., Sand, W., Nabuk Etim, I. I., Zhang, Y., Xu, A., Duan, J., & Zhang, R. (2024). The Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion and Protection of Pipelines: A Detailed Review. In Materials (Vol. 17, Number 20). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17204996
Okpala, G. N., Walker, A. L., Brideau, C., Colarusso, P., & Gieg, L. M. (2026). Determining biocide efficacy for treating established sulfate-reducing biofilms using flow cell systems. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1646177
Pereira, G. F., Pilz-Junior, H. L., & Corção, G. (2021). The impact of bacterial diversity on resistance to biocides in oilfields. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02494-7
PureLine. (2025). Oxidation Without Overkill: Balancing ClO Dosing for Effective HS & SRB Control.
Shi, X., Zhang, R., Sand, W., Mathivanan, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, N., Duan, J., & Hou, B. (2023). Comprehensive Review on the Use of Biocides in Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion. In Microorganisms (Vol. 11, Number 9). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092194
Spark, A., Wang, K., Cole, I., Law, D., & Ward, L. (2020). Microbiologically influenced corrosion: A review of the studies conducted on buried pipelines. In Corrosion Reviews (Vol. 38, Number 3, pp. 231–262). De Gruyter Open Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/corrrev-2019-0108
Tm, B. (2014). ABSENT (Negative-Non-aggressive) PRESENT (Positive-Aggressive) SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIA A slime Black ring beneath the ball, and/or A slime Black growth at the base of tube Advanced test information. http://www.DBI.ca
Udowo, V. M., Gao, Q., Yan, M., & Liu, F. (2023). Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Corrosion of Pipeline Steel in Polyacrylamide Gel Used for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 1–16. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257737390
Xu, L., Khan, A., Kijkla, P., Kumseranee, S., Punpruk, S., & Gu, T. (2024). Prevention of severe pitting corrosion of 13Cr pipeline steel by a sulfate reducing bacterium using a green biocide cocktail. Frontiers in Materials, Volume 11-2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2024.1407655
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright by Authors. Published by LEMIGAS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









