Optimizing CO2 Storage Strategies for Enhanced MineralTrapping and Plume Containment in The Aquifer Zoneof an Indonesian Gas Reservoir

Utomo Pratama Iskandar; Arik; Panuju; Garindia Grandis; Nanda Ilham

doi:10.29017/scog.v49i2.2067

Authors

Utomo Pratama Iskandar Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Arik Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Panuju Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Garindia Grandis Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Nanda Ilham Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i2.2067

Keywords:

carbon capture and storage (CCS), aquifer-zone CO₂ injection, gas reservoir aquifer, plume containment

Abstract

This study evaluates optimized CO₂ storage strategies in the aquifer zone of the SK gas field in Indonesia to improve plume containment and explore the potential for enhanced mineral trapping. A coupled compositional-flow and reactive-transport simulation workflow was applied using an upscaled reservoir model under a common safe operating pressure envelope and a containment constraint requiring the plume to remain within the aquifer zone over a 120-year simulation period. Three groups of scenarios were examined: well-placement sensitivity (A1–A3), production-assisted injection (B1–B3), and completion-design sensitivity (C1–C3). Among the baseline cases, A3 provided the best plume containment, with the most compact lateral footprint and smallest vertical plume spread, while A1 gave the highest total stored CO₂. Among the production-assisted cases, B2 was the most effective pressure-management option, producing the largest pressure reduction and a modest increase in total stored CO₂. Completion redesign generated the largest storage gains, increasing total stored CO₂ by about 28–33.3% relative to the corresponding baseline cases. Most scenarios maintained the plume confinement within the aquifer zone, although C1 showed localized upward CO₂ occurrence near the free-water level. Overall, the tested strategies improved storage performance, with A3 providing the best plume containment among the baseline cases, B2 delivering the strongest pressure-management benefit and increasing total stored CO₂ by approximately 3.93% relative to A2, and completion redesign producing the largest storage gains, increasing total stored CO₂ by about 28–33.3% relative to the corresponding baseline cases. Mineral trapping increased slightly in the completion-design cases, although it remained a minor component of total storage within the 120-year simulation period.

References

Akai, T., Saito, N., Hiyama, M., & Okabe, H. (2021). Numerical modelling on CO2 storage capacity in depleted gas reservoirs. Energies, 14(13), 3978.

Al-Hajri, M., & Al-Maldas, K. (2026). Numerical reservoir simulation of CO2 storage in saline aquifers: Assessment of trapping mechanisms, geochemistry, O2 impurities, and brine salinity. Processes, 14(2), 316.

Bohloli, B., et al. (2013). Field-data analysis and hydromechanical modeling of CO2 storage at In Salah, Algeria.

Chadwick, R. A., et al. (2011). Geological characteristics and performance data of the Sleipner CCS project Utsira Sand.

Chai, M., Niu, B., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Evaluating CO2 storage strategies in saline aquifer: A simulation study on pressure, rate, and duration. Indonesian Mining Journal, 28(2).

Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). (2024). Comprehensive CCUS research report for the ASEAN region.

Flett, M. (2008). Subsurface development of CO2 disposal for the Gorgon Project. Energy Procedia.

Geoquake. (2024). Indonesia earthquakes and the Ring of Fire: Unraveling the threat.

Hoteit, H., Fahs, M., & Soltanian, M. R. (2019). Assessment of CO2 injectivity during sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs. Geosciences, 9(5), 199.

Irzon, R., et al. (2024). Prospecting CCS Project in Indonesia: A Case Study in Meratus Mountains.

Iskandar, U. P. (2009). Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) – Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR): Global Potential in Indonesia. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 32(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.32.3.855

Iskandar, U. P., & Kurihara, M. (2022). Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) Networks for Forecasting Reservoir Performances in Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Operations. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 45(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.45.1.943

Iskandar, U. P., & Kurihara, M. (2025). Co-optimization of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Project Using Iterative Latin Hypercube Sampling (ILHS). Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i2.1818

Jang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). Geomechanical risks potentially caused by pore pressure buildup due to CO2 injection. Chemical Engineering Journal.

Jaya, A. (2009). Geological consideration for CO2 storage in Indonesia: A basinal scale outlook.

Jaya, A. (2015). Geological conditions, intensity, and distribution of faults for CO2 storage in Indonesia.

Jisc. (2024). Implications for fault locking south of Jakarta: Investigation of seismic activity along the Baribis fault.

Kazlou, T., Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2024). Feasible deployment of carbon capture and storage and the requirements of climate targets. Nature Climate Change, 14(10), 1047–1055.

Khanifar, A., Motaei, E., Mustapha, S., Ranjan, R., & Azman, M. F. (2024, October). Unveiling Challenges and Enhancing Robustness of CO2 Storage Capacity Estimation in a Depleted Gas Reservoir for Storage Development Planning. In SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition (p. D031S025R002). SPE.

LeksLawyer. (2023). Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) potential and regulation in Indonesia.

Li, Z., Hatzignatiou, D. G., & Ehlig-Economides, C. A. (2025). Carbon-Neutral Economic Viability of Enhanced CO2 Storage and Gas Recovery in Natural Gas Reservoirs Under Strong Bottom Water Drive. SPE Journal, 1–16.

Martin-Roberts, E., et al. (2021). Carbon capture and storage: Constraints on capacity from a geomechanical perspective. Frontiers in Energy Research.

Massagony, A., Pandit, R., & White, B. (2025). Political economy of energy policy in Indonesia towards net zero emissions by 2060. Energy for Sustainable Development, 88, 101757.

Mathieson, A., Midgley, J., Wright, I., Saoula, N., & Ringrose, P. (2011). In Salah CO2 storage JIP: CO2 sequestration monitoring and verification technologies applied at Krechba, Algeria. Energy Procedia, 4, 3596–3603.

Matkivskyi, S., & Burachok, O. (2022). Impact of reservoir heterogeneity on the control of water encroachment into gas-condensate reservoirs during CO2 injection. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 1 (30), 62–68.

MDPI. (2024). Carbon transportation technologies and logistics of marine transportation for offshore CCUS.

Medeiros, S. H. S., et al. (2025). Impact of CO2 concentration on trapping mechanisms in saline aquifers for CCS–Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas, 19(3), 899.

Orrick. (2025). Navigating Carbon Capture in Indonesia: A Key Step Forward regarding regulatory frameworks.

Pasarai, U. (2014). Ranking of Indonesia Sedimentary Basin and Storage Capacity Estimates for CO2 Geological Storage.

Pertamina. (2023). Examination of the potential and challenges of implementing CCS within a low-carbon development framework.

Ringrose, P., Atbi, M., Mason, D., Espinassous, M., Myhrer, Ø., Iding, M., & Mathieson, A. (2013). The In Salah CO2 storage project: Lessons learned and knowledge transfer. Energy Procedia, 37, 6226–6236.

Rucci, A., Vasco, D. W., & Novali, F. (2013). Monitoring the geologic storage of carbon dioxide using surface deformation: A geomechanical analysis of In Salah, Algeria. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 12, 120–131.

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). (2025). Independent study addresses causes of challenges in Asia-Pacific flagship CCS projects.

Syahbana, D. K., et al. (2019). Fracture network reactivation due to stress changes and magma intrusion in Indonesian volcanic settings.

Tatschner, K. (2025). The Sleipner CCS Project – An Active Case History for CO2 Storage in a Saline Aquifer. C&C Reservoirs.

Turan, A., et al. (2021). Mapping the potential CO2 source-sinks for Carbon Capture Storage from industry in Indonesia.

U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE). (2021). Meeting the Dual Challenge: Prospective geologic formations for CO2 storage. Energy.gov.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2024). Aquifers and Groundwater: Understanding hydrogeological characteristics and zone saturation.

Van den Hoek, P. J., Sengel, A., Vlad, D., & Marian, V. (2025, June). Reservoir Cooling and Fault Stability Analysis for CO2 Injection into Depleted Gas Reservoirs Including Joule-Thomson Effect. SPE Europe featured at the EAGE Conference and Exhibition.

Vasco, D. W., Ferretti, A., & Novali, F. (2010). Estimating permeability from quasi-static deformation: Temporal variations and arrival-time inversion. Geophysics, 75(4), O1–O13. (Applied to In Salah deformation and reservoir properties.)

Wang, Y., et al. (2025). Long-distance migration assisted structural trapping during CO2 storage in an offshore basin. Scientific Reports, 15, 28680.

White, J. A., et al. (2014). In the Salah CCS project, the geomechanical response and surface heave findings.

Worden, R. H. (2024). Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) in Saline Aquifers versus Depleted Gas Fields. Geosciences.

World Risk Report. (2024). Indonesia’s exposure to significant seismic and volcanic activity.

Zaidin, M. F., Chapoy, A., Coquelet, C., Valtz, A., A Raub, M. R., & Kantaatmadja, B. P. (2018, October). Impact of H2S in predicting the storage efficiency of CO2 injection in a high pressure high temperature (HPHT) carbonate aquifer-a case study in a Sarawak offshore high CO2 gas field, Malaysia. In the 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Melbourne (pp. 21–26).

Zhang, L., et al. (2024). Impact of rock mineralogy on reactive transport of CO2 during carbon sequestration in a saline aquifer–Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 14, 1927.

Zoback, M. D., & Gorelick, S. M. (2012). Geologic carbon storage and induced seismicity risks.