Techno-Economic Design of Onshore Gas Pipelines with High CO₂ and H₂S Content

Authors

  • Joko Pamungkas Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Indrianti Pramadewi PetroChina International Jabung
  • Yulius Deddy Hermawan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Avido Yuliestyan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Yusmardhany Yusuf Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Aditya Kurniawan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Muhammad Redo Ramadhan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Heni Anggorowati Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Perwitasari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Mutiara Wulandari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Muhammad Daffa Lazuardi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i1.2023

Keywords:

Onshore gas pipeline, Sour gas transportation, Techno-economic design, Erosional velocity ratio (EVR), Booster compression

Abstract

This study develops a simulation-based techno-economic framework for designing an onshore gas trunkline system to accommodate production from newly developed wells in the X and Y Fields. The system transports 35 MMSCFD of untreated natural gas containing approximately 60 mol% CO₂ and 70 ppm H₂S, where high acid gas content and declining wellhead pressure impose constraints on pressure delivery, flow velocity, material selection, and lifecycle cost. Steady-state hydraulic simulations were performed using UniSim R490 to evaluate early- and mid-life production scenarios based on pressure drop and erosional velocity ratio (EVR) in accordance with API RP 14E. Comparative analysis of candidate pipeline diameters shows that a 12-inch trunkline maintains a minimum delivery pressure of 50 psig while keeping EVR below unity, thereby satisfying hydraulic and mechanical integrity requirements without excessive recompression. The integration of an onshore booster compressor mitigates reservoir pressure decline and sustains gas transport to the central processing facility. Material selection analysis identifies duplex stainless steel and SS 316 as technically viable options for CO₂-H₂S service under controlled operating conditions. Techno-economic evaluation indicates that the selected configuration minimizes total lifecycle cost relative to alternative designs, with estimated CAPEX of USD 228.43 million and annual OPEX of USD 142.19 million. The results demonstrate that integrated hydraulic optimization, sour-service material selection, and economic assessment provide a robust and economically optimized design approach for onshore sour gas pipeline systems.

References

American Association of Cost Engineers International (AACEi). 2020. Cost estimate classification system—As applied in engineering, procurement, and construction for the process industries. Recommended Practice No. 18R-97. AACE International.

Agiaye E.O., Othman M. 2016. CO2 capture and usage: harnessing the CO2 content in natural gas for environmental and economic gains. SPE 178316: 1-18.

Andreasen, A., Bonto, M., and Montero, F. 2025. “A framework for optimisation and techno-economic analysis of CO2 pressurisation strategies for pipeline transportation. Science and Technology for Energy Transition. 80(18): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2024109

API 5L 2018. American Petroleum Institute 5L Specification for Line Pipe.

API RP 14E. 2018. Recommended practice for design and installation of offshore production platform piping systems.

ASME B31.3. 2022. Process piping guide.

Asyari, R. A. 2018. “Pemodelan Penentuan Lokasi Stasiun Kompresor Untuk Pipa Transmisi Gas Dari Sumatera Selatan-Jawa Barat.” Jurnal E-KOMTEK (Elektro-Komputer-Teknik), 2(1): 43-53. (in Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.37339/e-komtek.v2i1.93

Costa, G.M.N., Cardoso, S.G., Soares, R.O., Santana, G.L., Vieira de Melo, S.A.B. 2014. “Modeling high pressure vapor–liquid equilibrium of ternary systems containing supercritical CO2 and mixed organic solvents using Peng–Robinson equation of state.” Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 93: 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2014.04.016

Economides, M., and Kappos, L. 2009. “Exergy, Energy System Analysis and Optimization. Vol. II - Petroleum Pipeline Network Optimization Petroleum pipeline network optimization.” Department of Chemical Engineering. University of Huston. USA.

Hasan, T., Emami, K., Shah, R., Belokoskov, V., and Ly, M. 2023. “Techno-economic Assessment of a Hydrogen-based Islanded Microgrid in North-east.” Energy Reports. 9(2023): 3380–3396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.02.019

Hayat, M.A., Hasan, S., Elshurafa, A.M. “Strategic priorities and cost considerations for decarbonizing electricity generation using CCS and nuclear energy.” Energy Reports. 12 (2024): 2108-2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.08.017

Jalaluddin, Akmal, S., Nasrul, Z.A., and Ishak. 2019. “Analisa profil aliran fluida cair dan pressure drop pada pipa L menggunakan metode simulasi computational fluid dynamic (CFD).” Jurnal Teknologi Kimia. 8(1): 97–108. (in Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.29103/jtku.v8i1.3396

Jaubert, J-N., Vitu, S., Mutelet, F., and Corriou, J-P. 2005. “Extension of the PPR78 model (predictive 1978, Peng–Robinson EOS with temperature dependent kij calculated through a group contribution method) to systems containing aromatic compounds.” Fluid Phase Equilibria. 237(2005): 193–211. https://hal.science/hal-00069298

Ji, L., Song, F., and Zhang, X. 2024. “A review on hazards and risks to pipeline operation under transporting hydrogen energy and hydrogen-mixed natural gas.” Science and Technology for Energy Transition, 79(9): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2024004

Kristanto, D., and Hermawan, Y. D. 2020. “Comparative analysis between PI conventional and cascade control in heater-PFR-series.” Reaktor. 20(3): 129–137. https://doi.org/10.14710/reaktor.20.3.129-137

Meisingset, K.K., Statoil, Pedersen, K.S., and Calsep A/S. 2016. “Joule-Thomson Coefficients from Well Test Analysis Data.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE -181622-MS.

NACE MR0175/ISO 15156, 2020. Petroleum, petrochemical, and natural gas industries — Materials for use in H2S-containing environments in oil and gas production.

Peletiri, S.P., Rahmanian, N., and Mujtaba, I.M. 2018. “CO2 Pipeline Design: A Review.” Energies. 11(2184): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092184

Pamungkas, J., Hermawan, Y.D., Yuliestyan, A., Yusuf, Y., Kurniawan, A., Ramadhan, M.R., Anggorowati, H., and Perwitasari. 2024. “Conceptual Design of Pipeline/Trunkline with High CO2 and H2S from X-Y Fields to Central Gas Plant.” Final Report, PSME UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta.

Rahman, S.A., and Anjana, R. 2021. “Unisim Based Simulation and Analysis of Crude Oil Distillation.” IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 1114 (2021) 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1114/1/012094

Ramadhani, N.F., Irawan, D., Sudono, and Aziz, P.A. 2025. “A Techno-Economic Approach to Optimizing CCS Fiscal Parameters in Indonesia: A Case Study of Integrated Oil and Gas Development in CO-Rich Areas.” Scientific Contributions Oil & Gas, 48(3): 53-66. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i3.1809

Peters, M.S., and Timmerhaus, K.D. 1991. “Plant Design and Economics For Chemical Engineers.” 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, Ic. USA.

Sajan, K.C., Karki, S., Singh BK, R., and Pathak, A. 2024. “Techno-Economic Assessment of Pipeline Distribution System for Green Methane in Hetauda Industrial District.” Kathmandu University, School of Engineering, Depertment of Mechanical Engineering. Final Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28830.65608

Sugihardjo, Lubad, A.M., and Usman. 2024. “Evaluation of CO2 transportation modes for CCUS pilot plant in South Sumatera region.” AIP Conference Proceedings. 3069 020123 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0205731

Supriyadi, F., Putra, I.A., Abriyant, R.Y., Sismartono, D., Wibowo, C.S., and Priyono, B. 2025. “Techno-Economic Analysis of DME Implementation In Indonesia’s Household Energy Sector.” Scientific Contributions Oil & Gas, 48(2): 259-277. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i2.1804

Syarif, J. 2004. “Penentuan persamaan faktor gesekan baru dengan menggunakan metode regresi multivariabel bertolak ukur pada persamaan faktor gesekan Chen.” Jurnal Polimesin, 2(1): 85–94. (in Indonesian) http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jop.v2i1.1405

Wang, H., and Yang, F. 2024. “Research progress on corrosion behavior of oil and gas pipelines in wet CO₂ and H₂S environments.” International Journal of Energy. 5(2): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.54097/jr07qv37

Windyaningrum, A.S., Nurrahman, A., Pusparatu, Persada, A.A., and Fakhri, R. 2025. “Aspen Hysys Simulation for LPG Production Optimization In Deethanizer Column: Case Study in Delayed Coking Unit.” Scientific Contributions Oil & Gas. 48(1): 193-205. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i1.1738

Wongsri, M., and Hermawan, Y.D. 2005. “Heat Pathways Management for a Complex Energy Integrated Plant: Dynamic Simulation of HDA Plant.” J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Engrs., 36(4): 357-383. https://doi.org/10.6967/JCICE.200507.0357

Zhang, Z.X., Wang, G.X., Massarotto, P., and Rudolph, V. 2006. “Optimization of pipeline transport for CO2 sequestration.” Energy Convers. Manag. 47, 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.06.001

Published

27-02-2026

Issue

Section

Articles