PROSPECT FOR CO2 EOR TO OFFSET THE COST OF CCS AT COAL POWER PLANTS

Dr. Ir. Usman

Abstract


Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) technology has gained confidence in its ability to yield dramatic reductions of CO2 emissions from large stationary emissions sources such as coal-fired power plants. However, the pace of CCS projects has suffered from a less supportive business case. Utilization of CO2 for enhanced oil recovery (CO2 EOR) offers commercial opportunities owing to its economic profitability from incremental oil production offsetting the cost of CCS. This paper describes the prospect of CO2 EOR offsetting the cost of CCS at a coal-fired power plant. A coal-firedpower plant assumed to be commissioned in 2022 is selected as the basis of this study. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of this plant without CCS is estimated at US$ 6.4 cents/kWh and emits around 4.1 MtCO2/year. Integrating CCS to the selected coal power plant imposed additional costs associated with CO2 capture, transportation, and storage systems. The incremental costs are evaluated based on separation of 90%, 45%, and 22.5% of CO2 from the power plant flue gas. Under the 90% capture scenario, the LCOE raised more than double to 15.5 US cents/kWh which is primarily attributed to the energy penalty. A minimal reduction of 0.9 cents/kWh could bring the LCOE down below the ceiling price for geothermal. Reducing the CO2 capture percentage from 90% to 45% could reduce the LCOE to 11.2 US cents/kWh. Lowering the cost to 0.6 cents/kWh or more for this case would result in the LCOE below the state-owned electricity companys average cost of combined cycle gas turbine in 2012. Selling the captured CO2 under US$ 10 per tonne at the plant gate could help offset the cost. With numbers of new coal-fired power plants expected to be constructed in the near term, integrated coal CCS power plant with EOR is relevant for Indonesia.

Keywords


CO2 EOR; CCS; coal power plant; LCOE; CO2 emissions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Advanced Resources International Inc. (ARII), 2011. Global technology roadmap for CCS in industry: Sectoral assessment CO2 enhanced oil recovery, prepared for United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Arlington, USA.

Agarwal, A. and Parsons, J., 2011. Commercial Structure for Integrated CCS-EOR Projects, Energy Procedia, 4 (2011), 5786-5793.

Ahmad, A. and Baojun, B., 2010. Recent Development and Updated Screening Criteria of Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques, SPE 130726, the CPS/SPE International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, China.

Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2012. Determining the potential for carbon capture and storage in South- east Asia: Indonesia Country Report, LEMIGAS/ ADB, Jakarta.

Cebrucean, D., Cebrucean, V., and Ionel, I., 2014. CO2 Capture and Storage from Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Energy Procedia, 63 (2014), 18-26.

Faltinson, J.E. and Gunter, B., 2013. Net CO2 stored in North America EOR projects, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Volume 50 (7), 55-60.

Global Carbon Capture Storage Institute (GCCSI), 2016. The Global Status of CCS 2016: Summary Report, [Online]. Available: http://hub.globalccsinstitute.com/ sites/default/files/publications/201158/global-status- ccs-2016-summary-report.pdf, [Accessed: October 22, 2016].

Hammond, G.P. and Spargo, J., 2014. The prospects for coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and storage: A UK perspective, Energy Conversion Man- agement, 86 (2014), 476-489.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),

Mitigation of Climate Change, Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of IPCC, Cambridge University Press, USA.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2015. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, Paris, France.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2013. Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage, [Online]. Available: http://www.iea.org/publications/ freepublications/publication/TechnologyRoadmapCar bonCaptureandStorage.pdf, [Accessed: July 18, 2016].

Masaki, T., 2015. Carbon capture and storage for coal- fired power plants in Indonesia, World Bank Group, Washington DC, USA.

Saskpowerccs.com, 2016. Boundary Dam carbon capture and storage project, [Online]. Available: http://saskpowerccs.com/ccs-projects/boundary-dam- carbon-capture-project/, [Accessed: Jun 31, 2016].

Spigarelli, B.P. and Kawatra, S.K., 2013. Opportunities and challenges in carbon dioxide capture, J CO2 Utilization, 2013:1, 69-87.

State-owned electricity company (PLN), 2013. PLN Statistics 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.pln. co.id/dataweb/STAT/STAT2013ENG.pdf, [Accessed: June 29, 2015].

Sugihardjo, Usman, and Tobing, E.M.L. 2012. Pre- liminary carbon utilization and storage screening of oil fields in South Sumatra basin, Scientific Contribution Oil and Gas, Vol. 35(2), 57-65.

Sugiyono, A., Anindhita, M.S. Boedoyo, and Adiarso, 2015. Indonesia Energy Outlook 2015, Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Usman, Utomo, P.I., Sugihardjo, and Herru, L.S., 2014. A Systematic Approach to Source-Sink Matching

for CO2 EOR and Sequestration in South Sumatera, Energy Procedia, 63 (2014), 7750-7760.

Wang, M., Lawal, A., Stephenson, P., Sidders, J., Ramshaw, C., and Ramshaw, Yueng, H., 2011. Post- combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 89 (9), 1609-1624.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.39.3.94

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.