Reservoir Simulator For Improved Recovery Of Coalbed Methane (Icbm) Part Ii : Effect Of Coal Matrix Swelling And Shrinkage

Ego Syahrial

Abstract


Sequestration of CO2 in deep unmined coal seams is currently under development for improved recovery of coalbed methane (ICBM) as well as permanent storage of CO2. Recent studies have shown that CO2 displaces methane by adsorbing more readily onto the coal matrix compared to other greenhouse gases, and could therefore contribute towards reducing global warming. In order to carry out a more accurate assessment of the potential of ICBM and CO2 sequestration, field based numerical simulations are required. Existing simulators for primary CBM (coalbed methane) recovery cannot be applied since the process of CO2 injection in partially desorbed coalbeds is highly complex and not fully understood. The principal challenges encountered in numerical modelling of ICBM/CO2 sequestration processes which need to be solved include: (1) two-phase flow, (2) multiple gas components, (3) impact of coal matrix swelling and shrinkage on permeability, and (4) mixed gas sorption. This part II of this two-part paper series describes the development of a compositional simulator with the impact of matrix shrinkage/swelling on the production performance on primary and echanced recovery of coalbed methane. The numerical results for enhanced recovery indicate that matrix swelling associated with CO2 injection could results in more than an order of magnitude reduction in formation permeability around the injection well, hence prompt decline in well injectivity. The model prediction of the decline in well injectivity is consistent with the reported field observations in San Juan Basin USA. Also, a parametric study is conducted using this simulator to investigate the effects of coal properties on the enhancement of methane production efficiency based on published data.


Keywords


swelling, shrinkage, improved recovery of coalbed methane (ICBM), CO2 sequestration

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gray, I., 1987: “Reservoir Engineering in Coal

Semas: Part I – The Physical Process of Gas

Storage and Movement in Coal Seams”, SPE

Reservoir Engineering, February 1987, pg. 28-34.

Harpalani, S. and G. Chen, 1995: “Estimation of

Changes in Fracture Porosity of Coal with Gas

Emission”, Fuel, Vol. 74, p. 1491-1498.

Seidle, J.P. and Huitt L.G., 1995: “Experimental

Measurement of Coal Matrix Shrinkage Due to

Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat Permeability

Increases”, paper SPE 30010 presented

at 1995 SPE International Meeting on Petroleum

Engineering, Beijing, China, 14-17 November.

Palmer I. and Mansoori J., 1996: “How Permeability

Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in

Coalbeds: A new Model”, SPE paper 36737 presented

at the 1996 Ann. Tech. Conf., Denver,

Colorado, 6-9 October.

Shi J.Q., Durucan S. and Syahrial E.:”Reservoir

Depletion Induced Changes in Coalbed Permeability

and Implications for Enhanced CBM Recovery

using CO2 Injection”, Proc. 5th European

Coal Conference, Mons-Frameries, Belgium on

September 17-19, 2002, to be published in

“Geologica Belgica”, Journal of the Geological

Society of Belgium, Brussels.

Shi, J.Q. and Durucan, S., 2003: “Modelling of

Enhanced Methane Recovery and CO2 Sequestration

in Deep Coal Seams: the Impact of Coal

Matrix Shrinkage/Swelling on Cleat Permeability”,

Proc. 2003 Coalbed Methane Symposium,

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, May 5-9, paper no. 0343.

Reeves, S, 2002: “The Coal-Seq Project: Field

studies of ECBM and CO2 sequestration in coal”,

Coal Seq I Forum, March 14-15, Houston, Texas.

Reynolds, A.C., Guehria, F.M., and Thompson,

L.G.,: “A Robust Algorithm for Determining Hydrocarbon

PVT Properties Using a generalized

EOS”. SPE Paper 21588, presented at the International

Technical Meeting, Calgary, June 1990

King, G.R., Ertekin, T., and Schwerer, F.C.: “Numerical

Simulation of the Transient Behavior of

Coal Seam Degasification Wells,” SPEFE (April

pp. 165-183.

Shi, J.Q. and Durucan, S., 2003: “Changes in

Permeability of Coalbeds During Primary Recovery

– Part I: Model Formulation and Analysis”,

Proc. 2003 Coalbed Methane Symposium,

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, May 5-9, paper no. 0341.

Shi, J.Q. and Durucan, S., 2003: “Changes in

Permeability of Coalbeds During Primary Recovery

– Part 2: Model Validation and Field Application”,

Proc. 2003 Coalbed Methane Symposium,

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, May 5-9, paper no. 0342.

David H.-S. Law, L.G.H. (Bert) van der Meer,

and W.D. (Bill) Gunter: “Numerical Simulator

Comparison Study for Enhanced Coalbed Methane

Recovery Processes, Part I: Pure Carbon

Injection,” SPE Paper 75669, presented at the

SPE Gas Technology Symposium held in Calgary,

Alberta, Canada, 30 April-2 May 2002.

Syahrial E: “Coalbed Methane Simulator Development

for Improved Recovery of Coalbed Methane

and CO2 Sequestration”, paper SPE 93160,

presented in the 2005 SPE Asia Pacific Oil and

Gas Conference and Exhibition in Jakarta, Indonesia,

-7 April 2005




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.32.3.850

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.