Revised Zonal Subdivision Of The Late Miocene Nannoplankton Biostratigraphy For Kutei Basin

Panuju Panuju

Abstract


Lithological complexity and intense hydrocarbon exploration with the objective of Late Miocene sediments in Kutei Basin has provided the impetus for more refined Late Miocene nannoplankton zonation than the standard global schemes of Martini (1971). Investigation to the quantitative nannoplankton analysis results in Kutei Basin has been done, and there is evident that the deltaic sediments of this basin give an excellent nannoplankton assemblage dataset to refine the Late Miocene biostratigraphy. Biostratigraphically, Late Miocene ranges from the middle part of zone NN9 to the middle part of zone NN12 of Martini zonation (1971). Zone NN11 is the most crucial zone to be refined since this zone has long time interval (more than 2m.a.). In this paper, this zone can be subdivided into 7 subzones (NN11a-NN11g) based on relatively permanent occurrences of 6 biomarkers. They are from the base to the top, as follow: FO Discoaster quinqueramus, LO. Minilitha convalis, LO Discoaster bergenii, FO Amaurolithus primus, FO Reticulofenestra rotaria, LO, Discoaster berggrenii, LO. Reticulofenestra rotaria and LO Discoaster quinqueramus. In spite of zone NN9, NN10 and NN12 which have relatively short stratigraphic ranges, each zone can also be subdivided into 2 subzones. The base and the top of zone NN9 is indicated respectively by the FO and LO Discoaster hamatus. It can be subdivided by the FO Discoaster prepentaradiatus into subzone NN9a and NN9b. Zone NN10 is marked by the LO Discoaster hamatus at the base and FO Discoaster quinqueramus at the top. It can be subdivided into subzones NN10a and NN10b by the LO Discoaster bollii. Zone NN12 is characterized by the LO Discoaster quinqueramus at the base and the FO Ceratolithus rugosus at the top. This zone can be subdivided into subzone NN12a and NN12b by the LO Helicosphaera intermedia.


Keywords


biostratigraphy, nannoplankton, miocene, kutei basin

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, G.P. & Chambers, J.L.C., 1988. Sedimentation

in Modern Mahakam Delta. Indonesian Petroleum

Association, 253p.

Bown, P.R., 1999. Calcareous Nannoplankton Biostratigraphy.

Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bukry, D. 1973b. Coccolith and Silicoflagellate

Stratigraphy, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 18,

Eastern North Pacific. Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill.

Proj., 18, 817-31

Bukry, D. & Percival, S.F. 1971. New Tertiary Calcareous

Nannofossils. Tulane Stud.

Geol.Paleontology, 8, 123-46.

Gartner, S.Jr. 1969c. Correlation of Neogene Planktonic

Foraminifera and Calcareous Nannofossil

Zones. Trans. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc., 19,

-99.

Gartner, S.Jr & Bukry, D. 1975. Morphology and

Philogeny of the Coccolithophycean family

Ceratoliyhaceae. J. Res. U. S.Geol. Surv., 3, 451-

Knuttel, S., Russel, M.D. and Firth, J.V. 1989. Neogene

Calcareous Nannofossils from Leg 105: Implication

for Pleistocene Paleoceanographic Trends.

Prooceding of the ODP Scientific Result, 105, 245-

Martini, E., 1971. Standard Tertiary and Quaternary

Calcareous Nannoplankton Zonation in

Farinacci, A. (Ed). Proc. 2nd Plank. Conf. Roma,

pp. 739-784. Edizioni Tecnoschienza, Roma.

Martini, E. & Bramlette, M.N. 1963. Calcareous

Nannoplankton from the Experimental Mohole Drilling.

J. Paleontology, 37, 845-56.

Okada, H. & Bukry, D. 1980. Supplementary

Modification and Introduction of Code Numbers

to the Low Latitude Coccolith Biostratigraphic Zonation

(Bukry, 1973; 1975). Marine Micropaleontology,

(3), 321-5.

Payne, S.N.J., Ewen, D.F. & Bowman, M.J. 1999.

The Role and Value of ‘High Impact Biostratigrafi’

in Reservoir Appraisal and Development. Geological

Society, Special Publication No. 152.

Perch-Nielsen, K. 1985, Cenozoic Calcareous

Nannofossils, in Bolli, H.M., Saunders, J. B. &

Perch-Nielsen, K. eds., Plankton Stratigraphy.

Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Theodoridis, S.A. 1984. Calcareous Nannofossil

Biozonation of The Miocene and Revision of the

Helicoliths and Discoasters. Utrecht Micropaleontological

Bulletins, 32, 1-271.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.32.3.849

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.