Establishment Of More Reliable Equations For Estimation Of Coalbed Methane Proximate Analysis Data

Bambang Widarsono, Kosasih Sartadiredja, Bambang A Widjayanto

Abstract


Coal bed methane (CBM) data such as ash contents, moisture contents, volatile matters, and fixed carbon – commonly obtained from log analysis - are direct input to calculation of gas accumulation in CBM reservoirs. However, recent studies on some coal samples taken from Rambutan field CBM pilot project have shown that the commonly used log analysis equations are simply inapplicable for the field’s coal samples. Calculation results tend to give far different magnitudes when compared to laboratory results. After a series of re-evaluations and re-measurements on the laboratory results it was convinced that the problem does not lie with the laboratory results but with these ‘conventional’ equations. Therefore modification efforts are spent to find better equations. Comparisons between measured data (coal samples taken from two coal seams in the field) and calculated data show that only equation for ash contents gives accurate results. The other proximate analysis output data - i.e. moisture contents, volatile matter, and fixed carbon – is at considerable odd with their corresponding calculated data. Modification upon the original empirical models is then carried out. The following modifications on the equations have produced analogous but different empirical equations to the original equations. These equations certainly work more reliably for the field’s coals, and these better results underline that future log analyses in the field have to use the modified equations

Keywords


coal bed methane, proximate analysis, log analysis, modification, better-suited equations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ASTM D 3173 – 00 (2002) “Standard Test Method

for Moisture in the Analysis Sample of Coal and

Coke”. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor

Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 – 2959 –

USA.

ASTM D 3174 – 00 (2002) “Standard Test Method

for Ash in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke

from Coal”. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor

Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 – 2959

– USA.

ASTM D 3175 – 01 (2002) “Standard Test Method

for Volatile Matter in the Analysis Sample of Coal

and Coke”. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor

Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 – 2959

– USA.

Kim, A.G. (1977). “Estimating Methane Content

of Bituminous Coalbeds from Adsorption Data”.

US Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations

, 22p.

Mavor, M.J., Close, J.C. & McBane, R.A.

(1990). “ Formation Evaluation of Exploration

Coalbed Methane Wells”. SPE Paper #90-101,

presented at the International Technical Meeting,

Calgary June 10 – 13.

Mullen, M.J. (1989). “Coalbed Methane Resource

Evaluation From Wireline Logs in the

Northeastern San Juan Basin: A Case Study”.

SPE Paper #18946, presented at the SPE Joint

Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability

Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition, Denver –

Colorado, March 6 – 8.

Mullen, M.J. (1988). “Log Evaluation in Wells

Drilled for Coalbed Methane”. Rocky Mountain

Association of Geologists, pp 113 – 124.

Smith, D.M. & Williams, F.L. (1981). “A New

Method for Determining of the Gas Content of

Coal: Procedures and Results”. U.S. Bureau of

Mines Report of Investigations 8515.

Suwarna, N & 9 others (2003). “Evaluation of

CBM Exploration in South Sumatera, Vol. 1A”.

(in Bahasa Indonesia), unpublished report,

Ministery of Energy and Mineral Resources –

The Republic of Indonesia




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.32.2.839

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.