Establishment Of More Reliable Equations For Estimation Of Coalbed Methane Proximate Analysis Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.32.2.839Keywords:
coal bed methane, proximate analysis, log analysis, modification, better-suited equations.Abstract
Coal bed methane (CBM) data such as ash contents, moisture contents, volatile matters, and fixed carbon – commonly obtained from log analysis - are direct input to calculation of gas accumulation in CBM reservoirs. However, recent studies on some coal samples taken from Rambutan field CBM pilot project have shown that the commonly used log analysis equations are simply inapplicable for the field’s coal samples. Calculation results tend to give far different magnitudes when compared to laboratory results. After a series of re-evaluations and re-measurements on the laboratory results it was convinced that the problem does not lie with the laboratory results but with these ‘conventional’ equations. Therefore modification efforts are spent to find better equations. Comparisons between measured data (coal samples taken from two coal seams in the field) and calculated data show that only equation for ash contents gives accurate results. The other proximate analysis output data - i.e. moisture contents, volatile matter, and fixed carbon – is at considerable odd with their corresponding calculated data. Modification upon the original empirical models is then carried out. The following modifications on the equations have produced analogous but different empirical equations to the original equations. These equations certainly work more reliably for the field’s coals, and these better results underline that future log analyses in the field have to use the modified equationsReferences
ASTM D 3173 – 00 (2002) “Standard Test Method
for Moisture in the Analysis Sample of Coal and
Cokeâ€. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 – 2959 –
USA.
ASTM D 3174 – 00 (2002) “Standard Test Method
for Ash in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke
from Coalâ€. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 – 2959
– USA.
ASTM D 3175 – 01 (2002) “Standard Test Method
for Volatile Matter in the Analysis Sample of Coal
and Cokeâ€. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 – 2959
– USA.
Kim, A.G. (1977). “Estimating Methane Content
of Bituminous Coalbeds from Adsorption Dataâ€.
US Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations
, 22p.
Mavor, M.J., Close, J.C. & McBane, R.A.
(1990). “ Formation Evaluation of Exploration
Coalbed Methane Wellsâ€. SPE Paper #90-101,
presented at the International Technical Meeting,
Calgary June 10 – 13.
Mullen, M.J. (1989). “Coalbed Methane Resource
Evaluation From Wireline Logs in the
Northeastern San Juan Basin: A Case Studyâ€.
SPE Paper #18946, presented at the SPE Joint
Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability
Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition, Denver –
Colorado, March 6 – 8.
Mullen, M.J. (1988). “Log Evaluation in Wells
Drilled for Coalbed Methaneâ€. Rocky Mountain
Association of Geologists, pp 113 – 124.
Smith, D.M. & Williams, F.L. (1981). “A New
Method for Determining of the Gas Content of
Coal: Procedures and Resultsâ€. U.S. Bureau of
Mines Report of Investigations 8515.
Suwarna, N & 9 others (2003). “Evaluation of
CBM Exploration in South Sumatera, Vol. 1Aâ€.
(in Bahasa Indonesia), unpublished report,
Ministery of Energy and Mineral Resources –
The Republic of Indonesia