ROCK PHYSICS TEMPLATE TO ESTIMATE THE EFFECTS OF TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) AND MINERALOGY ON THE SEISMIC ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF IMMATURE SHALE RESERVOIR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.42.2.374Keywords:
shale reservoir, rock physics, organic content, clay mineral, elastic properties.Abstract
The low porosity and permeability shale are nowadays known as self-resourcing reservoirs. In the unique organic shales, TOC has a signifi cant contribution to the elastic properties of rocks. TOC behaves like porosity to a density log and effects in decreasing density. To reduce the uncertainty due to TOC and mineral variability effect, a quantitative interpretation of shale reservoirs should be done properly to obtain the best image of shale systems. In this study, we built rock-physics templates (RPT) to esti mate seismic response by defi ning the relationship between total organic carbon (TOC) and effective elastic properties of shale reservoirs of a data set from South Sumatera Basin, Indonesia. RPT is carried out by incorporating the amount of organic matter into shale pore space as a solid-fi lling inclusion. Moreover, shale porosity is assumed to be fully water-saturated determined by the in-situ conditions. We have estimated the general distribution of pore geometry by investigating aspect ratio from the dataset. A solid background of shale from several different minerals is estimated by using effective medium theory. Properties of porous rocks for solid pore infi ll are estimated from a generalization of Brown-Korringa Equation. Effective elastic properties of bulk rock frame fi lled with a fl uid are obtained from Gassmann equations. Results show that increasing the TOC volumes generally reduces both P-wave and S-wave velocities, acoustic impedance, and density. On the contrary, the vp/vs ratio increased as the impact of immature organic matter which will be more affecting shale rigidity than its compressibility.
References
Carcione, Jose M., Avseth, Per., 2015, Rock-Physics Templates for Clay-Rich Source Rocks, Geophysics: September 2015
Ciz, R., & S.A. Shapiro, 2007, Geophysics, 72, no.6, A75-A79
Franquet, J. A., Bratovich, M. W., & Glass, R. D., 2012, SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, SPE160862.
Kuster, Guy T., Toksoz, M. Nafi ., 1974, Velocity and Attenuation of Seismic Waves in Two-Phase Media: Part 1. Theoretical Formulation, Geophysics Vol. 39 Number 5.
Labani, M., & Rezaee, R., 2015, Book Chapter, in Rezaee, R. (ed), pp. 114-134, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Nur, A., 1992, EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 73, 43-66.
Russell, B. H., & Smith, T., 2007, CREWES Research Report, volume 19.
Sondergeld, C. H., K. E. Newsham, J. T. Comisky, M. C. Rice, & C. S. Rai, 2010, SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, 131768-PP.
Vernik, L., & Nur, A., 1992, Geophysics, 57, 727-35.
Zargari, S., & Manika, P., 2013, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC).
Zhu, Y., S. Xu, M. Payne, A. Martinez, E. Liu, C. Harris, & K. Bandyopadhyay, 2012, 82nd Annual International Meeting, SEG.
Zhu, Y., E. Liu, A. Martinez, M. A. Payne, C. Harris, 2011, The Leading Edge, 30, no. 3, 332-338