4d Seismic Monitoring in Highly Populated Area: Study of Ccus In Sukowati Oil Field, East Java

Authors

  • Oki Hedriana Institut Technologi Bandung

Keywords:

CCUS, 4D Seismic, Monitoring

Abstract

Indonesia is resolutely addressing climate change with a commitment to reduce carbon emissions by 29% in 2030, and we are on track to achieve net-zero emissions in 2050. This country acknowledges the important role of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in mitigating carbon emissions, especially from the energy sector, and at the same time increasing oil and gas production. This kind of approach is also well known as CO2-EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery) and CO2-EGR (Enhanced Gas Recovery). Sukowati field is situated in the East Java Province and will serve as a pioneering CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) project aimed at revitalizing the field. This initiative focuses on increasing oil production while capturing and storing carbon dioxide (CO2), contributing to environmental sustainability. To ensure its success, a robust monitoring system must be implemented for real-time data collection and analysis, optimizing recovery processes and minimizing environmental impact. Monitoring activities deliver information regarding the CO2 injected into the reservoir and the risk of leakage into the surrounding injection region. Several methods are discussed for monitoring CO2 plumes, but in the subsurface, seismic methods stand out as the most promising option. However, despite their effectiveness, seismic methods are also among the most expensive to execute, necessitating significant investment in technology and expertise to ensure accurate and reliable data. 4D seismic, also known as time-lapse seismic, entails performing repeated seismic surveys over a designated area to monitor changes in the subsurface effectively. This imaging technique enables us to visualize the movement of CO2 plumes within the target formation and can identify alterations in the reservoir that may suggest a potential CO2 leak. A seismic survey before the injection is needed to create a baseline image of the subsurface target reservoir. Changes in velocity and amplitude are identified when the seismic waves encounter the CO2 plumes injected into the reservoir target. The challenges of performing a 4D seismic imaging survey in a densely populated area are social impact, the possibility of damaging infrastructure, high noise levels, and high operating costs, particularly if it uses a subterranean explosive (dynamite) as a source of seismic signals. Therefore, the seismic signal source used in this survey was a non-impulsive vibroseis (vibrator) source.  A highly sensitive sensor cable-less (wireless) seismic recording system is also used. The irregular seismic acquisition design was adjusted to conditions in densely populated urban areas and can be done repeatedly.

References

Arts, R., Eiken, O., Chadwick, A., Zweigel, P., van der Meer, L., & Zinszner, B. (2004). Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data. Energy, 29(9–10), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.072

Awang H. Satyana; Margaretha E.M. Purwaningsih. (2002). Geochemistry and habitat of oil and gas in the East Java Basin: Regional evaluation and new observations. Indonesia Association of Geologists.

Biot, M. A. (1941). General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation*. In JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS (Vol. 12, Issue 2).

Chadwick, A., Arts, R., Eiken, O., Williamson, P., & Williams, G. (2006). Geophysical Monitoring of the CO2 Plume at Sleipner, North Sea (pp. 303–314). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4471-2_25

Ennis-King, J., Yannick Bouet, C. •, Boesch, F., Nourollah, H., & Johnson, D. (n.d.). IEAGHG Monitoring Network – Webinar & Virtual Discussion: Monitoring Expertise Showcase for Post-Closure Monitoring, 2021-TR03, April 2021.

FAN, J., ZHANG, F., TIAN, L., LIANG, Q., ZHANG, X., FANG, Q., LU, B., & LI, X. (2021). A method of monitoring gas saturation in carbon dioxide injection heavy oil reservoirs by pulsed neutron logging technology. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 48(6), 1420--1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60298-7

Hedriana, O., Sule, R. M., Usman, U., & Santoso, D. (2021). Preliminaries Study of Pilot Project Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage in An East Java Oil and Gas Field. 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference 2021, GHGT 2021.

Hnottavange-Telleen, K., Chabora, E., Finley, R. J., Greenberg, S. E., & Marsteller, S. (2011). Risk management in a large-scale CO2 geosequestration pilot project, Illinois, USA. Energy Procedia, 4, 4044–4051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.346

IEAGHG. (2015). IEAGHG, Review of offshore monitoring for CCS projects, 2015. www.ieaghg.org

Kasahara, J., & Hasada, Y. (2017). Chapter 1 - What is Time Lapse? In J. Kasahara & Y. Hasada (Eds.), Time Lapse Approach to Monitoring Oil, Gas, and CO2 Storage by Seismic Methods (pp. 1–10). Gulf Professional Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803588-7.00001-7

Landro, M. (2010). 4D seismic. In Petroleum Geoscience: From Sedimentary Environments to Rock Physics (pp. 427–444). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02332-3_19

Melo, C. L., Bressan, L. W., Ketzer, J. M. M., Constant, M. J., & De Castro Araujo Moreira, A. C. (2014). Study of gas tracers for CO2 monitoring. Energy Procedia, 63, 3864–3868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.416

Müller, N., Ramakrishnan, T. S., Boyd, A., & Sakruai, S. (2007). Time-lapse carbon dioxide monitoring with pulsed neutron logging. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1(4), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00071-0

Rütters, H. , M. I. , M. F. , F. K. , H. V. , A. A. , G. N. , B. C. , D. A. , K. L. , J. N. , S. A. , G. G. (2013). State-of-the-art of monitoring methods to evaluate storage site performance. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5108.5288

Satyana, A. H. (2002). Giant Field and New Exploration Concepts Seminar Jakarta Oligo-Miocene Reefs : East Java’s Giant Fields.

Yang, S., Fu, J., Zhao, N., Xu, C., Han, L., Wang, J., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & Liu, J. (2024). Comprehensive Analysis of the Annulus Pressure Buildup in Wells with Sustained Gas Leakage Below the Liquid Level. Processes, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122631

Yurikov, A., Tertyshnikov, K., Yavuz, S., Shashkin, P., Isaenkov, R., Sidenko, E., Glubokovskikh, S., Barraclough, P., & Pevzner, R. (2022). Seismic monitoring of CO2 geosequestration using multi-well 4D DAS VSP: Stage 3 of the CO2CRC Otway project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103726

Zeng, F., Zhao, G., & Zhu, L. (2012). Detecting CO 2 leakage in vertical wellbore through temperature logging. Fuel, 94, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.11.012

Published

03-09-2025

Issue

Section

Articles