4D Seismic Monitoring in Highly Populated Area: Study of CCUS in Sukowati Oil Field, East Java

Authors

  • Oki Hedriana Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Rachmat Sule Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Wawan Gunawan A. Kadir Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Asep K. Permadi Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Djoko Santoso Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Junita Trivianty Balai Besar Pengujian Minyak dan Gas Bumi LEMIGAS
  • Dewi Mersitarini PT. Pertamina Persero
  • Dimas Ardiyanta PT. Pertamina Persero
  • Sofyan Sumarna Universitas Pertamina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i3.1781

Keywords:

CCUS, 4D Seismic, Monitoring

Abstract

 Indonesia is resolutely addressing climate change with a commitment to reduce carbon emissions by 29% in 2030, and we are on track to achieve net-zero emissions in 2050. This country acknowledges the important role of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in mitigating carbon emissions, especially from the energy sector, and at the same time increasing oil and gas production. This kind of approach is also well known as CO2-EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery) and CO2-EGR (Enhanced Gas Recovery). Sukowati field is situated in the East Java Province and will serve as a pioneering CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) project aimed at revitalizing the field. This initiative focuses on increasing oil production while capturing and storing carbon dioxide (CO2), contributing to environmental sustainability. To ensure its success, a robust monitoring system must be implemented for real-time data collection and analysis, optimizing recovery processes and minimizing environmental impact. Monitoring activities deliver information regarding the CO2 injected into the reservoir and the risk of leakage into the surrounding injection region. Several methods are discussed for monitoring CO2 plumes, but in the subsurface, seismic methods stand out as the most promising option. However, despite their effectiveness, seismic methods are also among the most expensive to execute, necessitating significant investment in technology and expertise to ensure accurate and reliable data. 4D seismic, also known as time-lapse seismic, entails performing repeated seismic surveys over a designated area to monitor changes in the subsurface effectively. This imaging technique enables us to visualize the movement of CO2 plumes within the target formation and can identify alterations in the reservoir that may suggest a potential CO2 leak. A seismic survey before the injection is needed to create a baseline image of the subsurface target reservoir. Changes in velocity and amplitude are identified when the seismic waves encounter the CO2 plumes injected into the reservoir target. The challenges of performing a 4D seismic imaging survey in a densely populated area are social impact, the possibility of damaging infrastructure, high noise levels, and high operating costs, particularly if it uses a subterranean explosive (dynamite) as a source of seismic signals. To address these challenges, the study introduces a novel approach to designing irregular 4D seismic surveys. This method features a flexible acquisition layout that departs from traditional geometric symmetry. The survey utilizes a non-impulsive (vibrator) of semi-permanent seismic source and a highly sensitive, wireless seismic recording system. The irregular design is adaptively tailored based on the field's spatial characteristics, potential surface disruptions, and cost considerations. Despite not adhering to a conventional grid or orthogonal configuration, this approach ensures adequate offset and azimuth coverage necessary for detecting subsurface changes.

References

Awang H. Satyana; Margaretha E.M. Purwaningsih. (2002). Geochemistry and habitat of oil and gas in the East Java Basin: Regional evaluation and new observations. Indonesia Association of Geologists.

Biot, M. A. (1941). General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation. In JOURNAL OF APPLIED PEYSICS (Vol. 12, Issue 2).

Chadwick, A., Arts, R., Eiken, O., Williamson, P., & Williams, G. (2006). Geophysical Monitoring of the CO2 Plume at Sleipner, North Sea (pp. 303–314). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4471-2_25

Ennis-King, J., Yannick Bouet, C. •, Boesch, F., Nourollah, H., & Johnson, D. (2021). IEAGHG Monitoring Network – Webinar & Virtual Discussion: Monitoring Expertise Showcase for Post-Closure Monitoring, 2021-TR03, April 2021.

Hedriana, O., Sule, R. M., Usman, U., & Santoso, D. (2021). Preliminaries Study of Pilot Project Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage in An East Java Oil and Gas Field. 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference 2021, GHGT 2021.

Hnottavange-Telleen, K., Chabora, E., Finley, R. J., Greenberg, S. E., & Marsteller, S. (2011). Risk management in a large-scale CO2 geosequestration pilot project, Illinois, USA. Energy Procedia, 4, 4044–4051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.346

IEAGHG. (2015). IEAGHG, Review of offshore monitoring for CCS projects, 2015. www.ieaghg.org

Kasahara, J., & Hasada, Y. (2017). What is Time Lapse? In J. Kasahara & Y. Hasada (Eds.), Time Lapse Approach to Monitoring Oil, Gas, and CO2 Storage by Seismic Methods (pp. 1–10). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803588-7.00001-7

Landro, M. (2010). 4D seismic. In Petroleum Geoscience: From Sedimentary Environments to Rock Physics (pp. 427–444). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02332-3_19

Li, S., Brooks, N., Chen, T., Fang, X., Knapo, G., & Wilkinson, H. (2023). A Novel and Low-Cost Seismic Acquisition System Consisting of Permanent Controlled Linear Vibratory Sources and New Autonomous Seismic Sensors for CCS/CCUS Site Characterization, Plume Front Mapping and Real-Time Seismicity Monitoring.

Mahgoub, M., Bashir, Y., Bery, A. A., & Noufal, A. W. (2023). 4D seismic co-processing pre-stack depth migration for scarce acquisition repeatability. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 13(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01541-x

Pemkab Bojonegoro. (n.d.). Pemkab Bojonegoro. Retrieved June 5, 2025, from https://bojonegorokab.go.id/profile/demografi-3

Peterson, B., & Gerhardt, A. (2020). Pluto gas field: Successful placement of an infill well based on 4D seismic monitoring. Leading Edge, 39(7), 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle39070464.1

Satyana, A. H. (2002). Giant Field and New Exploration Concepts Seminar Jakarta Oligo-Miocene Reefs : East Java’s Giant Fields.

Tranter, N., de Kunder, R., Turner, B., & Drijkoningen, G. (2022). Acquiring sustainable, efficient high-resolution seismic data for geothermal exploration in an urban environment. First Break, 40(10), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022082

Triyoso, W., Sinaga, E. I., & Oktariena, M. (2024). Seismic Data Processing and Seismic Inversion in The Ray Parameter Domain: Common Reflection Point (CRP) Stack and Ray Impedance. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 47(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.47.2.1621

Triyoso, W., Supriyono, Akbar, F. S., Oktariena, M., Lestari, S., Yusuf, B. E., & Miraza, D. (2023). The 3D Seismic Survey Design of South Walio Offshore, Indonesia: Optimizing the 3D Survey Design Parameters. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 46(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.46.2.1552

Downloads

Published

31-10-2025

Issue

Section

Articles