Green Surfactant: Synthesis of Sulfonate Surfactants Using Strecker Modification Techniques and Surfactant Formulation for Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (Ceor) Applications

Ilham ardatul putra; Yudha Taufantri; Yani F. Alli; Dadan Damayandri; Yohanes B.D. Wangge; Didin Mujahidin

Authors

Ilham ardatul putra Chemistry Departement, Universitas Riau
Yudha Taufantri Research and Development Center for Oil and Gas Technology “LEMIGAS”
Yani F. Alli Research and Development Center for Oil and Gas Technology “LEMIGAS”
Dadan Damayandri Research and Development Center for Oil and Gas Technology “LEMIGAS”
Yohanes B.D. Wangge Research and Development Center for Oil and Gas Technology “LEMIGAS”
Didin Mujahidin Chemistry Departement, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Keywords:

Vegetable Surfactant, Chemical Injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Strechker Reaction

Abstract

Despite the continuing development of sustainable sources of energy, crude oil and natural gas resources remain crucial elements of the international economy. With global petroleum and liquid fuel demand continually increasing, improving the efficiency of extraction from existing natural reserves of petroleum is of utmost importance as the world gradually transitions away from fossil fuels toward more sustainable sources. Toward that end, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques have been developed and are used to minimize the amount of crude oil and petroleum that is left behind in underground reservoirs from conventional drilling extraction methods. In this study, surfactants were synthesized using a fatty acid derived from palm oil as a hydrophobic group and sulfonat as a hydrophilic group.

The use of vegetable oil as the raw material is likely due to its abundance and environmentally friendly. Sulfonation of anionic surfactant was performed by utilizing the Strecker modification technique in which an alkali metal bisulfite (versus sulfite) is used to sulfonate the epoxide group. The preferred sulfonating reagent is a mixture of sodium bisulphite and sodium sulfite (1:1; 1:2; 1:2.5) as well as various time reactions. Product surfactant was characterized by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) to determine the optimum condition and reaction conversion. The molecular structure of surfactant was confirmed by ¹H NMR. Nonionic surfactant was then analyzed by measuring the interfacial tension (IFT) of oil and water, wettability, and imbibition test.

The results showed that the optimum conditions to obtain the hight convertion were achieved by reacting oleil glisidil ether and Sodium Sulfite-Bisulfit at an equivalent mole ratio of 1: 2 and 21 hours’ reaction time. Oleil Glisidil Eter Sulfonat surfactant was able to decrease the IFT of oil and water as 10-2 dyne/cm in brine salinity condition of 18000 ppm and oil 34,39 ^OAPI. This study also formulated surfactants OGES and OGEP so that the IFT was up to 10-3 and the recovery factor from the imbibition test was up to 75% Rf. The results were then used to design the synthesis of vegetable surfactant oil with various carbon chain lengths and functional groups as an EOR surfactant hydrophobic group.

References

Ahmadi M.A., Arabsehi Y., Shadizadeh S.R., and Behbahani, 2014, Preliminary Evaluation of Mulberry Leaf-derived Surfactant on Interfacial Tension in Oil-Aqueous System: EOR Application. Fuel, 117. Part A. 749-755, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.081.

Al-Fikri, Muhamad Raihan, Veni Dwi Amelia Putri, Indra Gunawan, Novia Ritaand Muslim Abdurrahman, 2025, Methyl Ester Sulfonate: An Anionic Biosurfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Harsh Condition, Scientific Contributions Oil & Gas, Vol. 48. No. 1, April: 145 – 158, https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i1.1673

Baviere M, Bazin B, Noik C., 1988, Surfactants for EOR: olefin sulfonate behavior at high temperature and hardness. SPE Reserv Eng 3(2):597–603, https://doi.org/10.2118/14933-PA

Bera A., Kumar T., and Mandal A., 2014, Screening of Microemulsion Properties for Application in Enhanced Oil Recovery. Fuel, 121. 198-207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.051.

Bernard GG (1967) Effect of floodwater salinity on recovery of oil from cores containing clays, presented at the SPE California regional Meeting, Los Angeles, California, 1967/1/1/, 1967. Available: https://doi.org/10.2118/1725-MS.

Battistutta E., 2015, Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer (ASP) Flooding of Crude Oil at Under-Optimum Salinity Conditions, In: SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference. Kuala Lumpur SPE 174666-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/174666-MS

Chang H., Wang Y., Cui Y., Li G., Zhang B., Zhao X., Wei W., 2016, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 500. 230-238.

David D Whyte, Edwin O Korpi, 1962, Alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonate mixtures and processes for preparing the same, US Patent 3,024,273,

Fletcher P.D.I., Savory L.D., and Woods F.,2015, Model Study of Enhanced Oil Recovery by Flooding with Aqueous Surfactant Solution and Comparison with Theory. Langmuir, 31. 3076–3085, https://doi/10.1021/la5049612

Jang S.H., Liyanage P.J., Tagavifar M., Chang L., Upamali K.A.N., Lansakara D., Weerasooriya U., Pope G.A., 2016, A Systematic Method for reducing Surfactant Retention to Extremely Low Levels, In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Oklahoma, SPE 179685-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/179685-MS.

Hidayati S., Gultom N., Eni H., 2012, Optimasi Produksi Metil Ester Sulfonat dari Ester Minyak Jelatah. Reaktor. 14(2). 165-172, https://doi.org/10.14710/reaktor.14.2.165-172

Hirasaki G.J., Miller C.A., and Puerto M., 2011, Recent Advances in Surfactant EOR. Society of Petroleum Engineering. 6. 889-907, https://doi.org/10.2118/115386-PA.

Hosseinzade Khanamiri et al., 2016, EOR by Low Salinity Water and Surfactant at Low Concentration: Impact of Injection and In-Situ Brine Composition, Energy & Fuels 30(4), DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02899

Martin JC, 1959, The effects of clay on the displacement of heavy oil by water, presented at the Venezuelan Annual meeting, Caracas, Venezuela, 1959/1/1/, 1959. Available: https://doi. Org/10.2118/1411-G.

Mira R, Tun Tedja I, Ani S, and Dewi S., 2011, Process Improvement of Methyl Ester Sulfonate Surfactant Production and Its Formulation for The Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Application. J. Tek. Ind. Pert. 21(1).41-49, https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnaltin/article/view/3667.

Mahendrajana, Taufan, Indah Widiyaningsih1, Ivan Kurnia1, and Harry Budiharjo Sulistyarso, 2025, Fluid-to-fluid and Fluid-to-Rock Interaction on Sophorolipids Biosurfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Literature Review, Scientific Contributions Oil & Gas, Vol. 48. No. 1, April: 63 – 76, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i1.1688.

Nedjhioui, M., N.M. Moulai, A., Morsli, A., Bensmaili, 2005, Combined Effect of Polymer/ Surfactant/ Oil/ Alkali on Physical Chemical Properties. Desalination, 185,543–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.05.013.

Putra, Ilham Ardatul, Yani F. Alli, and Didin Mujahidin, 2020, Esterification of Polioxy-Based Surfactant utilizing Azeotrope Technique for Chemical Flooding Application, AIP Conf. Proc. 2230, 030003, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002729

Olaire A.A., 2014, Review of ASP EOR (Alkaline Surfactant Polymer Enhanced Oil Recovery) Technology in The Petroleum Industry: Prospects and Challenges. Energy, 77. 963-982, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.005

Sheng J.J., 2011, Modern chemical enhanced oil recovery: Theory and Practice, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Sugihardjo, 2013, A Study of Spontaneous Imbibition Recovery Mechanism of Surfactant Formulated from Methyl Ester Sulfonates. Scientific Contributions Oil & Gas. 36(2). 65-74, https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.36.2.763.

Yulianti S, Ariadne L, Juwono, Agus H, and Yan I., 2017, Study of Synthesis Polyethylene Glycol Oleate Sulfonated as an Anionic Surfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). Journal of Physics. Conf. Series 909 012078, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012078.

Zhang, J., Gao, H., & Xue, Q., 2020, Potential applications of microbial enhanced oil recovery to heavy oil. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 40, 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1761855.