Scenario-Based Evaluation of Economic Feasibility and Risk in City Gas Networks: A Case Study From East Java, Indonesia
Keywords:
natural gas network, optimization scenarios, internal rate of return, payback period, sensitivity analysisAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the economic feasibility and develop optimization scenarios for a natural gas distribution network intended for household use. The case study employs existing gas pricing and consumption data from East Java Province to support realistic economic modeling. The analysis examines how three important factors the number of customers, the price of gas, and how much gas is used affect key economic measures: net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), payback period (PP), and benefit-cost ratio (BCR). The research methodology includes secondary data collection, simulation of six different scenarios, and sensitivity analysis to examine the critical factors influencing project viability. Simulation results indicate that the scenario assuming a 25% increase in both gas selling price and gas consumption yields the most favorable economic performance, with an IRR of 14.21% and a payback period of less than seven years. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated use of scenario-based economic modeling, sensitivity analysis, and international benchmarking with comparable industries. Unlike conventional feasibility studies that focus solely on regional expansion, this research underscores the strategic role of pricing and consumption patterns as key determinants of financial sustainability in residential gas networks. The findings from the sensitivity analysis reveal that gas selling price has the most significant impact on economic performance, followed by gas consumption rate. These insights reinforce the importance of pricing adjustments and consumption optimization in enhancing the financial and operational sustainability of natural gas distribution networks. The study concludes with strategic recommendations for operators and policymakers to advance efficient and resilient gas-based energy infrastructure.
References
Andi, J., Yusgiantoro, P., & Siagian, U. (2025). Development of energy system modeling in East Kalimantan's household sector with bottom-up approach for energy demand forecast in 2060. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas (SCOG), 48(1). https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v48i1.1732
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2021). Handbook on Infrastructure Economic Analysis. Manila: Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/infrastructure-economic-analysis-handbook
Bambang, W. (2007). Indonesia’s natural gas: Production, reserves, and challenges. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas (SCOG), 30(1). https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.30.1.972
Biose, H., Dosunmu, A., & Nwaozuzu, C. (2020). Economic Impact Analysis of Natural Gas Pipeline Development in Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 6(12), 35–45.
https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v6.i12.2019.472
BPH Migas. (2021a). Regulation No. 13/2021 regarding the gas selling price in Gresik Regency.
BPH Migas. (2021b). Regulation No. 4/2021 concerning the second amendment to Regulation No. 22/P/BPH Migas/VII/2011 on the determination of natural gas prices for households and small customers.
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2019). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Directorate General of Oil and Gas (Ditjen Migas). (2013). Technical guidelines for the development of natural gas networks.
ECliST. (2021). Energy Outlook Indonesia 2021.https://www.eclist.org/energy-outlook-indonesia-2021
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2023). Natural gas prices. https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/
Engie Romania. (2024a). Gas distribution network management in Romania. Engie Romania S.A. https://www.engie.ro/
European Gas Hub. (2024b). TTF price index trends. https://www.europeangashub.com/
He, Y., Xia, T., Liu, Y., Zhou, L., & Zhou, B. (2013). Residential natural gas price affordability analysis—A case study of Beijing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 392–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.004
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). LNG market analysis.
https://www.iea.org/reports/lng-markets-analysis
Kayis, B. (2008). Risk management in engineering projects. McGraw-Hill.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM). (2019). National energy general plan.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM). (2023). Energy sector performance achievements in 2023. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Republic of Indonesia.
Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM). (2024). Regulation No. 14/2024 regarding the optimization of natural gas utilization.
Osaka Gas. (2023). Company profile and operations in Japan's urban gas distribution. Osaka Gas Co., Ltd. https://www.osakagas.co.jp/en/
Parikesit, D., Amrozi, M. R. F., Rachmawati, F., Utomo, C., Hatmoko, J. U. D., Hermawan, F., Handayani, F. S., Safitri, E., & Hendrawan, V. S. A. (2024). Engineering economics: Case-based learning in projects. UGM Press.
Purwanto, Y. S., et al. (2023). Development of natural gas energy for low-carbon urban areas.
SNI ISO 31010:2016. Risk management — Risk assessment techniques.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2022). The state of the climate in 2022. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/state-climate-2022
Winarsih, W. (2022). Legal framework on policy for natural gas development and utilization. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 31(3), 47–56.https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.31.3.1016
World Bank Group. (2020). Analyzing the Economic Viability of Energy Infrastructure Projects. Washington, D.C.: World Bank
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 © Copyright by Authors. Published by LEMIGAS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, under the following terms Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.