The Use of Modified Rock Physics Template to Monitor Fluid Saturation in Carbonate Reservoir

Authors

  • Riskiray Ryannugroho Geophysical Engineering Doctoral Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Sonny Winardhi Geophysical Engineering Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Djoko Santoso Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Mohammad Rachmat Sule Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Krishna Agra Pranatikta Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Fernando Lawrens Hutapea Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Dona Sita Ambarsari Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Keywords:

rock physics template, carbonate reservoir, porosity, fluid saturation

Abstract

Rock physics template (RPT) is a crossplot of acoustic impedance (AI) against the ratio of P- and S-wave velocities that is used for lithology and pore-fluid interpretation of well log data and/or pre-stack seismic inversion results. This study employs an interactive RPT approach, which facilitates calibration using available data and enhances the interpretation and prediction of pore fluids within carbonate reservoir rocks. A previously established RPT model was modified to construct the rock physics template and interpret trends in porosity and fluid saturation within a predictive framework. The modified approach to the RPT formulation demonstrates that the proposed model yields more accurate porosity and fluid saturation trends for the reservoir rocks in the study area than the previous RPT model, as evidenced by the theoretical curves of the Rock Physics Template (RPT) domain. To predict fluid saturation, a workflow was developed to build the modified RPT model that incorporates the Curved Pseudo Elastic Impedance (CPEI) and the Pseudo Elastic Inversion for Lithology (PEIL) attributes. These attributes were used to regulate the fluid saturation and density values in the model space assist for constructing the RPT model. The proposed method can also be used to monitor fluid saturation changes in oil, gas, or CO₂, utilizing the Vp/Vs ratio and acoustic impedance derived from the seismic inversion data and allows calibration with available datasets such as well logs and cores.

References

Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J., 2010. Rock-physics diagnostics of depositional texture, diagenetic alterations, and reservoir heterogeneity in high-porosity siliciclastic sediments and rocks — A review of selected models and suggested work flows. GEOPHYSICS 75, 75A31-75A47. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3483770

Avseth, P., Veggeland, T., Horn, F., 2014. Seismic screening for hydrocarbon prospects using rock-physics attributes. The Leading Edge 33, 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle33030266.1

Avseth, P.A., Odegaard, E., 2004. Well log and seismic data analysis using rock physics templates. First Break 22. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2004017

Aziz, P.A., Nurhandoko, B.E.B., Marhaendrajana, T., Siagian, U.W.R., Ariadji, T., 2025. The Effect of CO2 Brine Rock Interaction Towards Sand Onset Modelling in Dolomite Rich Sandstone: A Case Study in Air Benakat Formation, South Sumatera, Indonesia. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas 47, 3rd Edition (2024), 341–360. https https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.47.3.1682

Aziz, P.A., Rachmat, M., Chandra, S., Daton, W.N., Tony, B., 2023. Techno-Economic Solution For Extending Ccus Application In Natural Gas Fields: A Case Study Of B Gas Field In Indonesia. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas 46, 1st Edition (2024), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.46.1.1321

Batzle, M., Wang, Z., 1992. Seismic properties of pore fluids. GEOPHYSICS 57, 1396–1408. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443207

Crain, D.M., Benson, S.M., Saltzer, S.D., Durlofsky, L.J., 2024. An integrated framework for optimal monitoring and history matching in CO$$_{2}$$ storage projects. Comput Geosci 28, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-023-10216-3

Fawad, M., Mondol, N.H., 2022. Monitoring geological storage of CO2 using a new rock physics model. Sci Rep 12, 297. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04400-7

Fawad, M., Mondol, N.H., 2021. Monitoring geological storage of CO2: a new approach. Sci Rep 11, 5942. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85346-8

Gassmann, F., 1951. ELASTIC WAVES THROUGH A PACKING OF SPHERES. GEOPHYSICS 16, 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437718

Gaus, I., 2010. Role and impact of CO2–rock interactions during CO2 storage in sedimentary rocks. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.015

Hashin, Z., Shtrikman, S., 1963. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7

Hutami, H.Y., Priniarti, T.L., Winardhi, I.S., . H., 2019. ROCK PHYSICS TEMPLATE TO ESTIMATE THE EFFECTS OF TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) AND MINERALOGY ON THE SEISMIC ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF IMMATURE SHALE RESERVOIR. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas 42, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.42.2.374

IPCC, 2005. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage.

Lee, M.W., 2003. Velocity ratio and its application to predicting velocities. https://doi.org/10.3133/b2197

Lee, M.W., Hutchinson, D.R., Collett, T.S., Dillon, W.P., 1996. Seismic velocities for hydrate‐bearing sediments using weighted equation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 101, 20347–20358. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB01886

Luquot, L., Gouze, P., 2009. Experimental determination of porosity and permeability changes induced by injection of CO2 into carbonate rocks. Chem Geol 265, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.03.028

Mindlin, R.D., 1949. Compliance of Elastic Bodies in Contact. J Appl Mech 16, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009973

Nugroho, D., Rudyawan, A., Syihab, Z., 2023. Cenozoic Carbonate Reservoir in Indonesia Volume 1 : Unpublished Report, 1st ed, SKK Migas Memoir #2. ITB Press, Bandung.

Palgunadi, K.H., Viantini, I., Yogi, S., Winardhie, S., 2016. A novel approach comparison of curved pseudoelastic impedance in rock physics analysis, in: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 3448–3452. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13850446.1

Pelemo-Daniels, D., Nwafor, B.O., Stewart, R.R., 2023. CO2 Injection Monitoring: Enhancing Time-Lapse Seismic Inversion for Injected Volume Estimation in the Utsira Formation, Sleipner Field, North Sea. J Mar Sci Eng 11, 2275. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122275

Phani, K.K., Niyogi, S.K., 1986. Porosity dependence of ultrasonic velocity and elastic modulus in sintered uranium dioxide — a discussion. J Mater Sci Lett 5, 427–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01672350

Purwaningsih, M.E.M., Satyana, A.H., Budiyani, S., Noeradi, D., Malik, N.M., 2002. Evolution of the Late Oligocene Kujung reef complex in the Western East Cepu High, East Java Basin: seismic sequence stratigraphic study. 31st IAGI Annual Conference.

Sule, M.R., Kadir, W.G.A., Matsuoka, T., Prabowo, H., Sidemen, G.S., 2019. Gundih CCS Pilot Project: Current Status of the First Carbon Capture and Storage Project in South and Southeast Asia Regions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3366415

Winardhi, S., Dinanto, E., Sigalingging, A.S., Adityo, R., Utami, A.P., Ritonga, A.B., Satriawan, W., Budiyono, 2023. Curved Pseudo Elastic Impedance based on Elastic Attribute Rotation Scheme for Reservoir Petrophysical Property Prediction. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1288, 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1288/1/012026

Wyllie, M.R.J., Gregory, A.R., Gardner, L.W., 1956. Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media. GEOPHYSICS 21, 41–70. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438217

Published

20-08-2025

Issue

Section

Articles