PROSPECT FOR CO2 EOR TO OFFSET THE COST OF CCS AT COAL POWER PLANTS

Authors

  • Usman Usman ”LEMIGAS” R&D Center for Oil and Gas Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.39.3.1226

Keywords:

CO2 EOR, CCS, coal power plant, LCOE, CO2 emissions.

Abstract

Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) technology has gained confi dence in its ability to yield dramatic reductions of CO2 emissions from large stationary emissions sources such as coal-fi red power plants. However, the pace of CCS projects has suffered from a less supportive business case. Utilization of CO2 for enhanced oil recovery (CO2 EOR) offers commercial opportunities owing to its economic profi tability from incremental oil production offsetting the cost of CCS. This paper describes the prospect of CO2 EOR offsetting the cost of CCS at a coal-fi red power plant. A coal-fi redpower plant assumed to be commissioned in 2022 is selected as the basis of this study. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of this plant without CCS is estimated at US$ 6.4 cents/kWh and emits around 4.1 MtCO2 /year. Integrating CCS to the selected coal power plant imposed additional costs associated with CO2 capture, transportation, and storage systems. The incremental costs are evaluated based on separation of 90%, 45%, and 22.5% of CO2 from the power plant fl ue gas. Under the 90% capture scenario, the LCOE raised more than double to 15.5 US cents/kWh which is primarily attributed to the energy penalty. A minimal reduction of 0.9 cents/kWh could bring the LCOE down below the ceiling price for geothermal. Reducing the CO2 capture percentage from 90% to 45% could reduce the LCOE to 11.2 US cents/kWh. Lowering the cost to 0.6 cents/kWh or more for this case would result in the LCOE below the state-owned electricity company’s average cost of combined cycle gas turbine in 2012. Selling the captured CO2 under US$ 10 per tonne at the plant gate could help offset the cost. With numbers of new coal-fi red power plants expected to be constructed in the near term, integrated coal CCS power plant with EOR is relevant for Indonesia.

References

Advanced Resources International Inc. (ARII), 2011.

“Global technology roadmap for CCS in industry:

Sectoral assessment CO2

enhanced oil recoveryâ€,

prepared for United Nations Industrial Development

Organization, Arlington, USA.

Agarwal, A. and Parsons, J., 2011. “Commercial

Structure for Integrated CCS-EOR Projectsâ€, Energy

Procedia, 4 (2011), 5786-5793.

Ahmad, A. and Baojun, B., 2010. “Recent Development

and Updated Screening Criteria of Enhanced Oil

Recovery Techniquesâ€, SPE 130726, the CPS/SPE

International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition,

Beijing, China.

Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2012. “Determining

the potential for carbon capture and storage in Southeast Asia: Indonesia Country Reportâ€, LEMIGAS/

ADB, Jakarta.

Cebrucean, D., Cebrucean, V., and Ionel, I., 2014. “CO2

Capture and Storage from Fossil Fuel Power Plantsâ€,

Energy Procedia, 63 (2014), 18-26.

Faltinson, J.E. and Gunter, B., 2013. “Net CO2

stored in

North America EOR projectsâ€, Journal of Canadian

Petroleum Technology, Volume 50 (7), 55-60.

Global Carbon Capture Storage Institute (GCCSI), 2016.

“The Global Status of CCS 2016: Summary Reportâ€,

[Online]. Available: http://hub.globalccsinstitute.com/

sites/default/files/publications/201158/global-statusccs-2016-summary-report.pdf, [Accessed: October

, 2016].

Hammond, G.P. and Spargo, J., 2014. “The prospects

for coal-fi red power plants with carbon capture and

storage: A UK perspectiveâ€, Energy Conversion Management, 86 (2014), 476-489.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),

“Mitigation of Climate Changeâ€, Working

Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report

of IPCC, Cambridge University Press, USA.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2015. “CO2

Emissions from Fuel Combustionâ€, OECD/IEA,

Paris, France.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2013. “Technology

Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storageâ€, [Online].

Available: http://www.iea.org/publications/

freepublications/publication/TechnologyRoadmapCar

bonCaptureandStorage.pdf, [Accessed: July 18, 2016].

Masaki, T., 2015. “Carbon capture and storage for coalfi red power plants in Indonesiaâ€, World Bank Group,

Washington DC, USA.

Saskpowerccs.com, 2016. “Boundary Dam carbon

capture and storage projectâ€, [Online]. Available:

http://saskpowerccs.com/ccs-projects/boundary-damcarbon-capture-project/, [Accessed: Jun 31, 2016].

Spigarelli, B.P. and Kawatra, S.K., 2013. “Opportunities

and challenges in carbon dioxide capture,†J CO2

Utilization, 2013:1, 69-87.

State-owned electricity company (PLN), 2013. “PLN

Statistics 2013â€, [Online]. Available: http://www.pln.

co.id/dataweb/STAT/STAT2013ENG.pdf, [Accessed:

June 29, 2015].

Sugihardjo, Usman, and Tobing, E.M.L. 2012. “Preliminary carbon utilization and storage screening of oil

fi elds in South Sumatra basinâ€, Scientifi c Contribution

Oil and Gas, Vol. 35(2), 57-65

Sugiyono, A., Anindhita, M.S. Boedoyo, and Adiarso,

“Indonesia Energy Outlook 2015â€, Agency

for the Assessment and Application of Technology,

Jakarta, Indonesia.

Usman, Utomo, P.I., Sugihardjo, and Herru, L.S., 2014.

â€A Systematic Approach to Source-Sink Matching

for CO2

EOR and Sequestration in South Sumateraâ€,

Energy Procedia, 63 (2014), 7750-7760.

Wang, M., Lawal, A., Stephenson, P., Sidders, J.,

Ramshaw, C., and Ramshaw, Yueng, H., 2011. “Postcombustion CO2

capture with chemical absorption:

A state-of-the-art review,†Chemical Engineering

Research and Design, Vol. 89 (9), 1609-1624.

Downloads

Published

01-12-2016

Issue

Section

Articles