THE MANAGEMENT OF SPENT CATALYST OF HYDROCONVERSION PROCESSES IN ASEAN REFINERIES

A.S. Nasution, E. Jasjfi

Abstract


Catalytic processing is a keystone of today’s petroleum refining. The catalytic processes applied in the potreleum industry are generally large scale. In today’s operating climate of increased attentiveness toward environmental and safety issues, spent catalyst management options have became an important consideration for refiners. A catalyst deactivation determines how it can be handled after it is discharged from the processing unit. The type of the catalyst and its condition (whether it is considered hazardous) often determines the disposal route selected. Because of the self-heating and leaching problems associated with spent hydrotreating catalyst,it is recommended that refiners ship their spent catalysts to what is called “true recycles”. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), for example, is in the process of reevaluating the designation of spent hydroprocessing catalyst as an hazardous waste. Out of 3,837 MBPSD total crude oil currently processed in ASEAN (Brunai Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippenes, Singapore, Thailand, not including Vietnam, Laos and Myanmar) arround 61 percent volume is passed through catalytic processes (included hydroconversion processes 58 vol.%) to produce various fuel components such as gasoline and diesel oil. These hydroconversion processes use about 3,279 tons of catalyst with about 28 tons per day of spent catalyst. The present paper discusses briefly a survey on the management of spent catalyst of hydroconverion processes in ASEAN refineries and some aspects of catalyst poisoning of major hydroconversion processes in petroleum refinery. A survey on the management of spent catalyst from hydroconversion processes in ASEAN refineries is described in this paper.

Keywords


Spent Catalyst, Hydroconversion, Asean Refineries

Full Text:

PDF

References


A.S. Nasution and E. Jasjfi, The Management

of Spent Catalyst in RCC/FCC Units in ASEAt~

Refineries, ASCOPE 5th Refining Workshop,

Yogyakarta, Indonesia, October 31 - November 2,

A.T. Bell, et all., Protecting the Environment

through Catalysis, Chemical Engineering Progress,

February 1995, pp. 26-34.

B. Delmon and G.F. Froment, Catalytic Deactivation, Elsevier, Scientific, Publ., Co., New York,

Charles C. Radcliffe, Summary Evaluation of

Spent FCC Recycling as an Asphalt Filler,

Engelhard Spent Catalyst Project.

Filipp Gorra and Giorgio Scribanu, New Catalyst

Improved Presulfiding Results in 4th year

Hydrotreater, pp. 39-43, Oil and Gas Journal, August 23, 19..

Hiroki Koyama, Eiichi Nagai, Hidenobu Torri and

HideaJti Kumagai, Simple Changes Reduce Catalyst Deactivation, Pressure Drop Build up, Oil

and Gas Journal, November 20, 1995, pp. 68-71.

James A. Lassner, Reclaim Spent Catalysts

Properly,Chenical Engineering Progress, August

, pp. 95-97.

J.F. Le Page, Applied Heterocfenous Catalysis, Editions Technip, Paris, 1987.

J. Gary Welch, Paul Poyner and Robert F. Skelly,

New Presulfiding Technique Process Successful

in Commercial Trials, Oil and Gas Journal, Oct. 10,

Karel Hanbomdin and Edward Mazuroski, Petroleum and Refiiery Waste Minimation and Management. A Cost Effective Strategy for Establishing Sustainable Growth in the Energy Sector, IPA

60-012, Twenty Five Silver Anniversary, Indonesian Petroleum Association, Jakarta, October 1996.

J. Togo, and Y. Hori Chiyoda Corporation, States

of Residium Upgrading Technology, ASCOPE

’93 Conference of Exhibition, Bangkok, Thailand, November 1993.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.27.2.1052

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.